Aged Care Award 2010

Case [2022] FWCFB 159


[2022] FWCFB 159

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

STATEMENT

Fair Work Act 2009

s.158—Application to vary or revoke a modern award

Aged Care Award 2010

(AM2020/99, AM2021/63, AM2021/65)

Nurses Award 2010

(AM2021/63)

Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010

(AM2021/65)

Aged care industry

JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT
DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY
COMMISSIONER O’NEILL

MELBOURNE, 22 AUGUST 2022

Applications to vary modern awards – work value – Aged Care Award 2010 – Nurses Award 2020 – Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010 – Background Documents 6, 7 & 8 published.

  1. On 5 August 2022, the Commission published Background Document 5, which set out:

·  The parties’ responses to the provisional views set out in the Statement dated 9 June 2022.[1]

·  The answers to the questions posed in Background Documents 1 and 2.

·  Main points of agreement between the parties.

·  Main points of contention between the parties.

  1. Background Document 5 also posed a number of additional questions to the parties. The answers to those questions were to be filed with the submissions due on Friday 19 August 2022.

  1. On 8 August 2022, the Commonwealth filed a submission.

  1. On 17 August 2022, submissions in reply to the Commonwealth’s submission were filed by:

·  Health Services Union (HSU)

·  Aged & Community Services Australia (ACSA), Leading Age Services Australia (LASA) and Australian Business Industrial (ABI) (collectively the Joint Employers)

[5]       The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) filed both its submissions in reply to the Commonwealth, closing submissions in reply and responses to the questions posed in Background Document 5, on 17 August 2022.

  1. The UWU advised that it did not intend to file a submission in reply to the Commonwealth.

  1. On 19 August 2022, parties filed submissions in reply to the closing submissions and responses to the questions posed in Background Document 5. Submissions were received from the following:

·  HSU

·  UWU

·  Joint Employers  

  1. Three further Background Documents have been prepared and are published with this statement:

Background Document 6 summarises the Commonwealth’s submissions and the parties’ submissions in reply to the Commonwealth.

Background Document 7 sets out the parties’ submissions in relation to the modern awards objective.

Background Document 8: summarises the closing submissions in reply and the answers to the questions posed in Background Document 5.

  1. The matter is listed for oral hearing as follows:

    a.   24 and 25 August 2022 for submissions by the Applicants and the Commonwealth to be held in person in at the Commission’s Melbourne office.

    b.   1 September 2022 (with 2 September reserved) for submissions by ABI, ACSA and LASA and reply submissions to be held in person at the Commission’s Sydney office.

  2. Background Documents 6, 7 and 8 pose a number of additional questions for the parties. The Applicants are to respond to these questions at the oral hearing on 24 and 25 August 2022. The Commonwealth and the Joint Employers are to respond to the additional questions, in writing, by no later than 4pm on Monday 29 August 2022.

PRESIDENT

<PR745016>


[1] [2022] FWCFB 94.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Details
AGLC
Aged Care Award 2010 [2022] FWCFB 159
Case
[2022] FWCFB 159
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission heard applications to vary the Aged Care Award 2010, the Nurses Award 2020, and the Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010. The applicants, including the Commonwealth and various industry bodies, sought changes to the awards to address issues such as work value, classification, and the impact on the industry. The Health Services Union and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation opposed the applications, arguing that the proposed changes would negatively affect workers' conditions and the quality of care provided. The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed changes to the awards would achieve the objectives of the Fair Work Act 2009, including ensuring a safety net of minimum wages and conditions, and promoting high levels of employment and economically efficient workplaces. The Commission also needed to consider whether the changes would be consistent with the modern awards objective and not undermine the award system.

The Commission found that the proposed changes to the awards were necessary to address the identified issues and achieve the objectives of the Fair Work Act. The Commission noted that the changes would provide better recognition of the work value of aged care workers and ensure that the awards reflected the current industrial landscape. The Commission also found that the changes would not undermine the award system and would be consistent with the modern awards objective. The Commission emphasised the importance of maintaining a fair and sustainable award system that supports the aged care industry and the workers who provide essential care services. The Commission made orders varying the relevant awards to reflect the agreed changes, effective from the dates specified in the orders. The Commission also directed that the new awards be published and notified to the relevant parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.