| IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
| Office of the Registry |
Sydney No S28 of 1990 B e t w e e n -
TIBOR BALOG
Appellant
and
INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST
CORRUPTION
Respondent
Order for costs
MASON CJ
BRENNAN J
DEANE J
DAWSON
TOOHEY J
GAUDRON J
McHUGH J
| Balog(4) | 1 | 12/12/91 |
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 12 DECEMBER 1991, AT 11.05 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
| MASON CJ: | The Court, by its order made on 28 June 1990, |
intended that there should be no order as to the
costs of the proceedings before Mr Justice Smart inthe Supreme Court of New South Wales.
Accordingly the order which the Court makes on
the notice of motion is: motion dismissed with
costs.
AT 11.06 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE
| Balog | 2 | 12/12/91 |
- AGLC
- Balog v Independent Commission Against Corruption [1991] HCATrans 359
- Case
- [1991] HCATrans 359
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the High Court was the interpretation and effect of a previous costs order made by the Court on 28 June 1990. Specifically, the Court had to determine whether that order intended to preclude any costs being awarded in the Supreme Court proceedings.
The Chief Justice, Mason CJ, clarified that the Court's prior order of 28 June 1990 was intended to mean that there should be no order as to the costs of the proceedings in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the notice of motion before it, with costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.