NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CITATION: Boele v Norsemeter [2003] NSWCA 173
FILE NUMBER(S):
40476/02
HEARING DATE(S): 25 June 2003
JUDGMENT DATE: 25/06/2003
PARTIES:
Pieter Boele
v
Norsemeter Holding AS
JUDGMENT OF: Handley JA
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): ED 50173/01
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Einstein J
COUNSEL:
Appellant: A W Street SC
Respondent: Dr A S Bell
SOLICITORS:
Appellant: Hogan Geikie Poole
Respondent: Gadens
CATCHWORDS:
LEGISLATION CITED:
DECISION:
Order (5) in the judgment of Handley, Beazley and Giles JJA dated 13 November 2002 is amended under SCR Pt 20 r 10(1) to read
That the respondent pay the appellant's costs of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal and have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act if qualified.
JUDGMENT:
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
40476/02
HANDLEY JA
25 June 2003
PIETER BOELE v NORSEMETER HOLDING AS
Judgment
HANDLEY JA: On 13 November a Court comprising Beazley, Giles JJA and myself delivered judgment in this matter, allowed the appeal and pronounced five orders. Order 5 read:
“Appellant pay respondent’s costs of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal and have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act if qualified”.
As a result of the Court’s attention being directed recently to the form of this order, it became apparent that the order as pronounced was the result of an error arising from an accidental slip or omission within SCR Pt 20 r 10(1) and within the inherent jurisdiction of the Court to rectify its records to ensure that they correctly reflect the intention of the Court.
It is the proper case to amend the order and I will substitute in lieu of order 5 an order that the respondent pay the appellant’s costs of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal and have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act if qualified.
Costs of the appearance this morning are not asked for and I will simply direct the amendment of the orders of the Court.
******
LAST UPDATED: 01/07/2003
- AGLC
- Boele v Norsemeter [2003] NSWCA 173
- Case
- [2003] NSWCA 173
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was the appropriate order for costs, specifically whether the respondent should be ordered to pay the appellant's costs and whether a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act should be granted.
The Court of Appeal ordered that the respondent pay the appellant's costs of both the application for leave to appeal and the appeal. Furthermore, the Court ordered that the respondent have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act, provided they qualified for such a certificate.
Orders
Orders of the court
Order (5) in the judgment of Handley, Beazley and Giles JJA dated 13 November 2002 is amended under SCR Pt 20 r 10(1) to read
That the respondent pay the appellant's costs of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal and have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act if qualified.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.