Bombara & Anor v Electricity Networks Corporation T/As Western Power

Case [2019] HCASL 301


BOMBARA & ANOR

v

ELECTRICITY NETWORKS CORPORATION T/AS WESTERN POWER & ORS

[2019] HCASL 301
P24/2019

  1. An extension of time is required to enable this application for special leave to appeal to proceed.  The application does not establish any reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Western Australia.  The application for special leave should be dismissed.  Accordingly, it would be futile to grant an extension of time.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.

S.J. Gageler P.A. Keane
11 September 2019
Details
AGLC
Bombara & Anor v Electricity Networks Corporation T/As Western Power [2019] HCASL 301
Case
[2019] HCASL 301
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Bombara & Anor v Electricity Networks Corporation T/As Western Power, the applicants sought an extension of time to enable their application for special leave to appeal to proceed. The applicants, Bombara and Anor, were involved in a dispute with the Electricity Networks Corporation T/As Western Power and others over issues related to the provision of electricity. The Supreme Court of Western Australia's Court of Appeal had dismissed the applicants' appeal, and they now sought to appeal that decision to the High Court of Australia.

The primary legal issue the High Court had to address was whether to grant an extension of time for the applicants to proceed with their appeal. The applicants argued that they had a valid reason to seek an extension, but the court needed to determine whether this reason was sufficient to warrant the extension. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the application for special leave to appeal demonstrated any grounds that would cast doubt on the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision.

In its decision, the High Court found that the application did not establish any reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision. Consequently, the court determined that it would be futile to grant an extension of time for the application to proceed. The High Court held that the application for special leave should be dismissed and ordered the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application with costs. The court's reasoning was that the application did not meet the necessary threshold for the High Court to exercise its discretion to grant an extension of time and hear the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.