FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brett & Lennox [2021] FamCA 57
File number(s): PAC 1234 of 2020 Judgment of: FOSTER J Date of judgment: 8 February 2021 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Where Application for final parenting orders made – Where the Applicant mother and Respondent father failed to appear at four court events – Where application dismissed Legislation: Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) r 11.02 Number of paragraphs: 4 Date of hearing: 8 February 2021 Place: Parramatta Applicant – self-represented litigant: The Applicant did not attend Respondent – self-represented litigant: The Respondent did not attend Solicitor for the Independent Children’s Lawyer: Mason Mills & Associates-Solicitors & Advocates did not attend ORDERS
PAC 1234 of 2020 BETWEEN: MS BRETT
ApplicantAND: MR LENNOX
RespondentMS MASON
Independent Children’s Lawyer
ORDER MADE BY:
FOSTER J
DATE OF ORDER:
8 FEBRUARY 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The proceedings are dismissed.
2.In the event that there is an application for costs by the Independent Children’s Lawyer, that the Independent Children’s Lawyer make such application by way of short written submissions filed and served by no later than Friday, 26 February 2021.
3.In the event that the parties seek to make submissions in response, that the parties or either of them file short submissions in response by no later than Friday, 19 March 2021.
4.Upon completion of submissions judgment be reserved to chambers.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Brett & Lennox has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
FOSTER J:
These proceedings were before this Court on 20 July 2020 and on that date there was no appearance by the parties. The Court ordered on that date that the parties attend a Children and Parent Intake Assessment conference on 27 August 2020.
On 17 November 2020 proceedings were before this Court for further judicial case management and there was no appearance by or on behalf of the Applicant mother or Respondent father and proceedings were adjourned to 19 January 2021.
The proceedings again came before the Court on 19 January 2021. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Applicant or Respondent. The Independent Children’s Lawyer Ms Mason appeared. Orders were made on 19 January 2021 adjourning proceedings to today noting an order was made that in the event that there was no appearance by or on behalf of the Applicant or the Respondent the proceedings would stand dismissed. Otherwise, costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer were reserved pending further order.
The matter was called this morning at 10.45 am or shortly thereafter. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Applicant mother or Respondent father and accordingly proceedings before this Court are dismissed pursuant Rule 11.02.
I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Foster. Associate:
Dated: 8 February 2021
- AGLC
- Brett & Lennox [2021] FamCA 57
- Case
- [2021] FamCA 57
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the proceedings should be dismissed due to the parties' repeated non-attendance.
Foster J determined that the parties' persistent failure to attend court, despite multiple opportunities, demonstrated a lack of engagement with the judicial process and an unwillingness to prosecute or defend the application. The court applied the principle that parties have a responsibility to actively participate in proceedings before them. Consequently, the court ordered the dismissal of the proceedings. The court also made provision for the Independent Children’s Lawyer to make an application for costs, with a timetable for written submissions from all parties before judgment is reserved.
Orders
Orders of the court
PAC 1234 of 2020
BETWEEN:
MS BRETT
Applicant
AND:
MR LENNOX
Respondent
MS MASON
Independent Children’s Lawyer
ORDER MADE BY:
FOSTER J
DATE OF ORDER:
8 FEBRUARY 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The proceedings are dismissed.
2. In the event that there is an application for costs by the Independent Children’s Lawyer, that the Independent Children’s Lawyer make such application by way of short written submissions filed and served by no later than Friday, 26 February 2021.
3. In the event that the parties seek to make submissions in response, that the parties or either of them file short submissions in response by no later than Friday, 19 March 2021.
4. Upon completion of submissions judgment be reserved to chambers.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.