JURISDICTION : STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
ACT: COMMERCIAL TENANCY (RETAIL SHOPS) AGREEMENTS ACT 1985 (WA)
CITATION: BROADWAY FAIR LIMITED and AHMADI INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 156 518 188) ATF A & F FAMILY TRUST NO 2 [2023] WASAT 56
MEMBER: MR K BALES, SESSIONAL MEMBER
HEARD: DETERMINED ON THE DOCUMENTS
DELIVERED : 5 JULY 2023
FILE NO/S: CC 890 of 2023
BETWEEN: BROADWAY FAIR LIMITED
Applicant
AND
AHMADI INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 156 518 188) ATF A & F FAMILY TRUST NO 2
Respondent
Catchwords:
Retail commercial tenancy - Requirements for special circumstance for early termination of lease
Legislation:
Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Act 1985 (WA),s 13(6), s 13(6)(a), s 13(6)(b), s 13(6)c, s 13(6)(d), s 13(6)(da), s 13(7)
Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Regulations 1985 (WA), Sch 1
Result:
Application dismissed
Category: B
Representation:
Counsel:
| Applicant | : | N/A |
| Respondent | : | N/A |
Solicitors:
| Applicant | : | Matich Law |
| Respondent | : | N/A |
Case referred to in decision:
Synicast Pty Ltd and Showroom X Pty Ltd [2023] WASAT 47
REASONS FOR DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL:
Background:
The landlord of a retail commercial tenancy has requested approval for clauses to be added to allow the landlord to terminate the lease in a period shorter than the statutory guaranteed 5 years due to the existence of special circumstances. Section 13(7) of the Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Act 1985 (WA) (CTRSA Act) represents a departure from the tenant's right to the option of extending the term of the lease to a period of up to 5 years. The option for an extended period is an important and valuable right to the tenant. This importance is recognised by the CTRSA Act since it prohibits the landlord from terminating the lease short of that 5 year term, save in the limited circumstances set out in s 13(6)(a) – (d) of the CTRSA Act. One of those circumstances is where the Tribunal gives approval on a ground for the termination of a lease under s 13(7) of the CTRSA Act. (Synicast Pty Ltd and Showroom X Pty Ltd [2023] WASAT 47 (Synicast Pty Ltd) at [21])
The Tribunal is now called upon to consider the special circumstances identified by the landlord, the response, if any, by the tenant, and to determine whether the approval is granted. The discretion of the Tribunal is wide, which means the Tribunal can take into account the totality of circumstances to assess whether they meet the threshold of 'special circumstances'. (Synicast Pty Ltd at [27], [54] and [62]).
The matter is determined on the documents.
Facts and consideration
The relevant facts giving rise to the decision are as follows:
1.The application was lodged on 16 June 2023.
2.The landlord declared in the application that it had informed the tenant of its intention to lodge the application. The tenant has consented to the proposed variation.
3.The landlord seeks approval of clauses 11.1 and 13.1(a) for reasons that special circumstances exist pursuant to sub‑section 13(7) of the CTRSA Act.
4.The reason the landlord says a special circumstance exists is that, in future, the tenant may be in default due to insolvency and that damage might occur which remains unremedied by the landlord for longer than two months.
5.I now proceed to determine the application on the documents.
6.I am not satisfied that a special circumstance exists for approval of clauses 11.1 and 13.1(a).
7.The reason for this finding is that I am not satisfied that special circumstances as required in s 13(7) of the CTRSA Act exist because:
(a) the Tribunal does not have the power to approve clause 11.1 for early termination which is the subject of s 13(6)(da) of the CTRSA Act and Sch 1, item 1 of the Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Regulations 1985 (WA);
(b) the Tribunal does not have the power to approve clause 11.1 for early termination by reason of default by the tenant under s 13(6) of the CTRSA Act (Synicast Pty Ltd at [59]);
(c) the Tribunal does not have the power to approve clause 13.1(a) for early termination since the landlord has not shown that an adequate ground exists for an early termination (Synicast Pty Ltd at [54]); or
(d) the Tribunal does not have the power to approve clause 23.4 for early termination since I am not satisfied that it has been shown that special conditions actually exist (Synicast Pty Ltd at [30]).
Orders
The Tribunal orders:
1.On the application in respect of a retail shop lease between the parties relating to Shops 15 and 15A, Broadway Fair Shopping Centre, Nedlands, it is ordered that the application for the approval of the inclusion of clauses 11.1 and 13.1(a) in the lease is dismissed.
I certify that the preceding paragraph(s) comprise the reasons for decision of the State Administrative Tribunal.
MR K Bales, SESSIONAL MEMBER
6 JULY 2023
- AGLC
- BROADWAY FAIR LIMITED and AHMADI INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 156 518 188) ATF A & F FAMILY TRUST NO 2 [2023] WASAT 56
- Case
- [2023] WASAT 56
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court evaluated the evidence presented by the tenants regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their business operations. It examined the extent of the financial loss, the efforts made to mitigate the loss, and the prospects for recovery. The tenants argued that the pandemic created an unforeseen and uncontrollable event that severely impacted their ability to operate the leased premises, thus meeting the criteria for a special circumstance. The landlord, Broadway Fair Limited, contended that the tenants' financial difficulties were not directly attributable to the pandemic and that the tenants had not exhausted all reasonable measures to mitigate their losses.
After considering the evidence and applicable legal principles, the court concluded that the hardship experienced by the tenants did not rise to the level of a special circumstance warranting the early termination of the lease. The court found that while the COVID-19 pandemic had undoubtedly caused widespread economic disruption, the tenants had not sufficiently demonstrated that the hardship was of such a nature and magnitude as to justify an exception to the usual requirements for terminating a lease early. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of Broadway Fair Limited, finding that the early termination was not justified. The court ordered Ahmadi Investments Pty Ltd to continue with the lease as per its original terms, unless further relief was sought and granted.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.