Doyle v Minister for Natural Resources and Mines

Case [2005] QLC 49


LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Doyle  v Minister for Natural Resources and Mines  [2005] QLC 0049
PARTIES: John, Jon and Sonya Doyle
(applicants)
v.

Minister for Natural Resources and Mines
(respondent)

FILE NO: LA2005/0844
DIVISION: Land Court of Queensland
PROCEEDING: In the matter of an application for a stay of operation against the Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources and Mines in respect of Tree Clearing Permit Nos 2003/003795, 2003/003796, 2003/003797, 2003/003798 and 2003/003799.
DELIVERED ON: 15 September 2005
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARD: On the papers without an oral hearing:  Rule 36 of the Land Court Rules 2000
MEMBER: The President
ORDERS:

1. The application under s.425 of the Land Act 1994 for a stay of the original decision is adjourned.

2.         The parties will bear their own costs.

CATCHWORDS: Practice and Procedure - Application for say of original decision - Internal review of conditions of tree clearing permits - No internal review decision - Land Act 1994 s.425
SUBMISSIONS BY: Mr P Sheridan for the applicants
Mr M Heather for the respondent
  1. This is an application by landowners in the Charleville district against the conditions attaching to tree clearing permits granted by the Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources and Mines.

Background

  1. On 17 October 2003, the Chief Executive granted five tree clearing permits to the applicants with conditions.  On 19 November 2003, the applicants sought an internal review of the conditions of the permits.  As at the date of the present application, no decision in respect of the internal review had been provided to the applicants, therefore no appeal can be brought before the Land Court.

Relief Sought

  1. The applicants seek a stay of the original decision until the review and appeal process is finalised. 

  2. The application for stay of the original decision was set down for hearing on 15 September 2005.  However, on 14 September 2005 the parties agreed to consent orders being issued adjoining the present applications.

Orders

1.The application under s.425 of the Land Act 1994 for a stay of the original decision is adjourned.

2.The parties will bear their own costs.

JJ TRICKETT

PRESIDENT OF THE LAND COURT

Details
AGLC
Doyle v Minister for Natural Resources and Mines [2005] QLC 49
Case
[2005] QLC 49
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Doyle versus the Minister for Natural Resources and Mines involves a dispute concerning the conditions of tree clearing permits under the Land Act 1994. The applicant, Doyle, sought a stay of the original decision made by the Minister regarding the permit conditions. The matter was heard and determined by the Court.

The central legal issue before the court was whether it had the authority to grant the applicant's request for a stay of the original decision when there had been no internal review of the decision. This issue hinged on the interpretation and application of section 425 of the Land Act 1994, which outlines the procedure for internal review and subsequent judicial review of administrative decisions.

The court considered the statutory framework provided by the Land Act 1994 and determined that it did not have the jurisdiction to grant the applicant's application for a stay of the original decision in the absence of an internal review. The court held that the statutory mechanism for judicial review of administrative decisions required an internal review to have been conducted before a stay could be granted. Consequently, the court adjourned the application and ordered that the parties bear their own costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The application under s.425 of the Land Act 1994 for a stay of the original decision is adjourned.

2. The parties will bear their own costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.