FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Galla & Harroun [2021] FCCA 576
File number(s): PAC 3822 of 2020 Judgment of: JUDGE MYERS Date of judgment: 23 February 2021 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – divorce – whether there was a valid marriage Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 Number of paragraphs: 3 Date of hearing: 23 February 2021 Place: Parramatta Solicitor for the Applicant: Pannu Lawyers For the Respondent: Respondent appeared in person ORDERS
PAC 3822 of 2020 BETWEEN: MR GALLA
Applicant
AND: MS HARROUN
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE MYERS
DATE OF ORDER:
23 FEBRUARY 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The Court grants a divorce to take effect in one month and one day from today’s orders.
2.The matter is adjourned until 1 April 2021 at 10:00 am by way of telephone-link for Directions in respect of a Costs Hearing.
THE COURT NOTES THAT:
(A)The Application for costs made by the Applicant.
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Galla & Harroun is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
JUDGE MYERS:
This is a matter that comes before the Court today, in a contested divorce application. The Court has viewed a marriage certificate that was filed on 29 July 2020. There are affidavits that have been filed on behalf of the Applicant and Respondent. The Respondent says that there was not a marriage. There is a Marriage Certificate. The Court has considered the affidavit filed by the Respondent. The Affidavit sworn or affirmed on 20 November 2020 and filed on 2 December 2020 attaches a certificate saying that there is no registration of the marriage. There is a Marriage Certificate.
The Court has read an Affidavit sworn by the Imam who performed the marriage saying that the parties are married and has read an affidavit of a witness saying that they were present and saw them married. The witness deposes to being present at the marriage and seeing the Certificate of Marriage.
The Court firstly finds that there is a marriage. The Court finds jurisdiction. The Court finds that the marriage has irretrievably broken down and there is a child of the marriage to which the appropriate arrangements have been made for the child’s provision.
ORDERS DELIVERED
I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of Judge Myers. Associate:
Dated: 27 April 2021
- AGLC
- Galla & Harroun [2021] FCCA 576
- Case
- [2021] FCCA 576
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether to grant the divorce. The Court also noted an application for costs made by the Applicant, and in relation to this, it drew attention to the provisions of section 121 of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) concerning the publication of identifying information in family law proceedings.
The Court granted the divorce, to take effect one month and one day from the date of the order. The matter was subsequently adjourned for directions regarding a costs hearing.
Orders
Orders of the court
PAC 3822 of 2020
BETWEEN:
MR GALLA
Applicant
AND:
MS HARROUN
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE MYERS
DATE OF ORDER:
23 FEBRUARY 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Court grants a divorce to take effect in one month and one day from today’s orders.
2. The matter is adjourned until 1 April 2021 at 10:00 am by way of telephone-link for Directions in respect of a Costs Hearing.
THE COURT NOTES THAT:
(A) The Application for costs made by the Applicant.
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.