GP1 v State of New South Wales

Case [2023] NSWSC 1042


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: GP1 v State of New South Wales [2023] NSWSC 1042
Hearing dates: 18 August 2023
Date of orders: 18 August 2023
Decision date: 18 August 2023
Jurisdiction:Common Law
Before: Garling J
Decision:

See [8]

Catchwords:

CIVIL PROCEDURE – commencement of proceedings – leave to commence action – Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 – where proceedings are representative proceedings – leave granted

Legislation Cited:

Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981

Government Sector Employment Act 2013

Cases Cited:

Not Applicable

Texts Cited:

Not Applicable

Category:Procedural rulings
Parties: ST1 (P)
GP1 (P)
State of New South Wales (D) (in both matters)
Representation:

Counsel:
D Villa SC (P)
A Williams (D)

Solicitors:
Mills Oakley (P)
Makinson D’Apice (D)
File Number(s): 2023/209918
Publication restriction: Not Applicable

JUDGMENT

  1. By Notice of Motion dated 30 June 2023, the plaintiff in these representative proceedings seeks leave nunc pro tunc to commence and maintain these proceedings.

  2. Section 5 of the Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 provides that the Court may grant such leave only if it is satisfied that the proceedings are not an abuse of process and that there is a prima facie ground for the proceedings.

Satisfaction of section 5 matters

  1. I am satisfied that there is a prima facie ground for the bringing of the proceedings pleaded and that the proceedings are not an abuse of process. I am so satisfied by reason of the following matters:

  1. the terms of the pleading itself;

  2. that in respect of conduct of the kind specified in the Statement of Claim, or else similar conduct, the alleged perpetrator has in fact been convicted with respect to some identified complainants, and

  3. that the Minister for Corrections, on 28 July 2023, announced that the government had established an Inquiry under s 82 of the Government Sector Employment Act 2013 with the coercive powers of a Royal Commission, to examine and report on a number of terms of reference. These terms of reference include the adequacy of the systems of supervision and oversight that applied to the alleged perpetrator at the Dillwynia Women's Correctional Centre, whether any matters arising from the Inquiry should be referred to law enforcement or other agencies, and whether any employee other than the alleged perpetrator of Corrective Services NSW had knowledge or suspicion of his offending and what steps they took.

  1. I note that the proceedings are representative proceedings and that the identified plaintiff is bringing the proceedings on behalf of a defined group.

  2. I am informed that at present there are approximately 50 individuals who have identified themselves as potential members of the group. That fact is also relevant to a consideration as to whether or not, in this representative proceeding, there is any question of abuse of process or lack of a good prima facie ground for proceeding.

Conclusion

  1. I am abundantly satisfied that this is a matter in which there ought be a grant of leave to the plaintiff known as GP1 to commence and maintain these proceedings.

Additional matter

  1. I note that I am not called upon today to consider the application of the Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act to individual group members who might otherwise, should they commence proceedings on their own behalf, be required to obtain leave. That question can await another time.

Orders

  1. Accordingly, I make these orders:

  1. Grant leave nunc pro tunc to the plaintiff to institute and maintain these proceedings on her own behalf and on behalf of the group defined in the Statement of Claim.

  2. Otherwise dismiss the Notice of Motion dated 30 June 2023.

**********

Details
AGLC
GP1 v State of New South Wales [2023] NSWSC 1042
Case
[2023] NSWSC 1042
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The proceedings in GP1 v State of New South Wales involved an application for leave to commence representative civil proceedings against the State of New South Wales. The applicant, GP1, sought leave under the Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981, on the basis that the proceedings were representative in nature. The application was heard by the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the proceedings were properly characterised as representative civil proceedings within the meaning of the Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981. This involved an interpretation of the statutory provisions and consideration of whether the requirements for representative proceedings had been met. Specifically, the court had to determine if the proceedings involved claims by multiple persons with a common issue of law or fact, and if the applicant had a sufficient connection to those claims.

The court held that the proceedings did indeed constitute representative civil proceedings as defined by the Act. It found that the claims involved common issues of law and fact, and that the applicant had a sufficient connection to the other claimants. The court was satisfied that the application met the statutory criteria for leave to commence representative proceedings. Accordingly, the court granted the application for leave.

The final orders of the court were that the applicant, GP1, be granted leave to commence representative civil proceedings against the State of New South Wales under the Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981. The court provided directions for the management of the proceedings, including setting a timetable for the filing of further documents and the conduct of the case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.