IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY MS MONFORT FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL
[2024] HCASL 171
B22/2024
The applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal from the whole of the judgment of the Appellate Jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) (Aldridge, Austin and Harper JJ) of 8 March 2024. The amended application for special leave to appeal has no prospects of success. It would therefore be futile to grant the extension of time that is sought.
Special leave to appeal is refused.
Gordon J
Steward J8 August 2024
- AGLC
- In the Matter Of An Application BY Ms Monfort for Special Leave To Appeal [2024] HCASL 171
- Case
- [2024] HCASL 171
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether Ms Monfort's amended application for special leave to appeal had any prospects of success. The court needed to determine if granting an extension of time would serve any useful purpose, given that the application itself was unlikely to succeed. The court also considered whether the extension of time would be in the interests of justice, given the futility of the application. Ultimately, the court was tasked with balancing the principles of justice and efficiency in the appellate process against the applicant's right to seek a review of the decision.
In its decision, the court found that the amended application for special leave to appeal had no prospects of success. The court concluded that the application was essentially futile, meaning that granting an extension of time would not serve any useful purpose. The court held that it would be inappropriate to grant the extension of time under these circumstances. Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was refused. The court's decision emphasised the importance of ensuring that the appellate process remains efficient and that the court's resources are not wasted on applications that have no reasonable chance of success.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.