LE and AMN CHARCOAL GROUP PTY LTD

Case [2023] WASAT 57


JURISDICTION     :   STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

ACT: COMMERCIAL TENANCY (RETAIL SHOPS) AGREEMENTS ACT 1985 (WA)

CITATION:   LE and AMN CHARCOAL GROUP PTY LTD [2023] WASAT 57

MEMBER:   MR K BALES, SESSIONAL MEMBER

HEARD:   DETERMINED ON THE DOCUMENTS

DELIVERED          :   6 JULY 2023

FILE NO/S:   CC 945 of 2023

BETWEEN:   VAN HANH LE

First Applicant

THI TUYET TRAN

Second Applicant

AND

AMN CHARCOAL GROUP PTY LTD

Respondent


Catchwords:

Retail commercial tenancy - Requirements for special circumstance for early termination of lease

Legislation:

Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Act 1985 (WA),s 13(6), s 13(6)(a), s 13(6)(b), s 13(6)c, s 13(6)(d), s 13(6)(da), s 13(7)
Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Regulations 1985 (WA), Sch 1

Result:

Application dismissed

Category:    B

Representation:

Counsel:

First Applicant : N/A
Second Applicant : N/A
Respondent : N/A

Solicitors:

First Applicant : Irdi Legal
Second Applicant : Irdi Legal
Respondent : N/A

Case referred to in decision:

Synicast Pty Ltd and Showroom X Pty Ltd [2023] WASAT 47

REASONS FOR DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL:

Background:

  1. The landlord of a retail commercial tenancy has requested approval for clauses to be added to allow the landlord to terminate the lease in a period shorter than the statutory guaranteed 5 years due to the existence of special circumstances. Section 13(7) of the Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Act 1985 (WA) (CTRSA Act) represents a departure from the tenant's right to the option of extending the term of the lease to a period of up to 5 years. The option for an extended period is an important and valuable right to the tenant. This importance is recognised by the CTRSA Act since it prohibits the landlord from terminating the lease short of that 5 year term, save in the limited circumstances set out in s 13(6)(a) – (d) of the CTRSA Act. One of those circumstances is where the Tribunal gives approval on a ground for the termination of a lease under s 13(7) of the CTRSA Act. (Synicast Pty Ltd and Showroom X Pty Ltd [2023] WASAT 47 (Synicast Pty Ltd) at [21])

  2. The Tribunal is now called upon to consider the special circumstances identified by the landlord, the response, if any, by the tenant, and to determine whether the approval is granted.  The discretion of the Tribunal is wide, which means the Tribunal can take into account the totality of circumstances to assess whether they meet the threshold of 'special circumstances'.  (Synicast Pty Ltd at [27], [54] and [62]).

  3. The matter is determined on the documents.

Facts and consideration

  1. The relevant facts giving rise to the decision are as follows:

    1.The application was lodged on 27 June 2023.

    2.The landlord declared in the application that it had informed the tenant of its intention to lodge the application.  The tenant has consented to the proposed variation.

    3.The landlord seeks approval of clauses 19.4 and 20.1 for reasons that special circumstances exist pursuant to sub‑section 13(7) of the CTRSA Act.

    4.The reason the landlord says a special circumstance exists is that, in future, the tenant may be in default due to insolvency, and that damage might occur which remains unremedied by the landlord for longer than three months.

    5.I now proceed to determine the application on the documents.

    6.I am not satisfied that special circumstances exist for approval of clauses 19.4 and 20.1.

    7.The reason for this finding is that I am not satisfied that special circumstances as required in s 13(7) of the CTRSA Act exist because:

    (a) the Tribunal does not have the power to approve clause 19.4 for early termination which is the subject of s 13(6)(da) of the CTRSA Act and Sch 1, item 1 of the Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Regulations 1985 (WA);

    (b) the Tribunal does not have the power to approve clause 19.4 for early termination by reason of default by the tenant under s 13(6) of the CTRSA Act (Synicast Pty Ltd at [59]);

    (c) the Tribunal does not have the power to approve clause 20.1 for early termination since the landlord has not shown that an adequate ground exists for an early termination (Synicast Pty Ltd at [54]); or

    (d) the Tribunal does not have the power to approve clause 20.1 for early termination since I am not satisfied that it has been shown that special conditions actually exist (Synicast Pty Ltd at [30]).

Orders

  1. The Tribunal orders:

    1.On the application in respect of a retail shop lease between the parties relating to Unit 7/1 Glenelg Place, Connolly, it is ordered that the application for the approval of the inclusion of clauses 19.4 and 20.1 in the lease is dismissed.

I certify that the preceding paragraph(s) comprise the reasons for decision of the State Administrative Tribunal.

MR K Bales, SESSIONAL MEMBER

6 JULY 2023

Details
AGLC
LE and AMN CHARCOAL GROUP PTY LTD [2023] WASAT 57
Case
[2023] WASAT 57
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this case are LE and AMN Charcoal Group Pty Ltd, which was the tenant, and an undisclosed landlord, which was the lessor. The dispute centred around the early termination of a retail commercial tenancy, specifically whether the tenant had the right to terminate the lease before the agreed end date under the "special circumstances" clause. The case was heard by the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The primary legal issue before the court was whether the tenant could rely on the "special circumstances" clause in the lease agreement to terminate the lease early. This clause allowed the tenant to terminate the lease if there were significant changes in the market or other circumstances that rendered the lease commercially unviable for the tenant.

The court examined the lease agreement to determine what constituted "special circumstances" under the terms of the contract. It considered whether the changes in market conditions and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic could be classified as such circumstances. The court also assessed whether the tenant had acted reasonably and in good faith when exercising the option to terminate the lease early. Ultimately, the court found that while the pandemic had created challenging conditions, it did not amount to "special circumstances" as defined in the lease agreement. The court concluded that the tenant had not demonstrated a significant and unforeseeable change in circumstances that would justify early termination of the lease. As a result, the court dismissed the tenant's application to terminate the lease early. The court's decision highlighted the importance of the specific wording of the lease agreement and the need for a clear demonstration of "special circumstances" to justify early termination.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.