LI
v
THE QUEEN
[2020] HCASL 6
S311/2019
The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Gleeson JA, Johnson and Fagan JJ agreeing) dismissing an application for leave to appeal against conviction of one count of supply of not less than a large commercial quantity of a prohibited drug and two counts of possessing a prohibited weapon.
The applicant identifies no question of principle which it would be in the interests of justice for this Court to consider and there is no reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Criminal Appeal's judgment. Special leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
G.A.A Nettle M.M Gordon 5 February 2020
- AGLC
- Li v The Queen [2020] HCASL 6
- Case
- [2020] HCASL 6
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the applicant had not identified any question of principle that would warrant the High Court's consideration. Furthermore, there was no reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Criminal Appeal's judgment. The court held that the appeal was not in the interests of justice and dismissed the application for special leave. The court also directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
This case highlights the importance of identifying a question of principle that would warrant the High Court's consideration when seeking special leave to appeal. The court's decision in this case also underscores the importance of the correctness of the Court of Criminal Appeal's judgment. In this case, the court found no reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Criminal Appeal's judgment and dismissed the application for special leave. The final orders were to dismiss the application and direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.