LI WANG & ANOR
v
STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
[2012] HCASL 10
S351/2011
The applicants seek special leave to appeal against orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Campbell JA and Handley AJA) dismissing the applicants' application for leave to appeal against orders of a single judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Schmidt J).
On 23 June 2011, Schmidt J delivered reasons for judgment in relation to several notices of motion filed in proceedings against the respondent. Whilst the reasons given foreshadowed orders dismissing in part the applicants' notices of motion and statement of claim, her Honour did not make such orders on that occasion. On 18 August 2011, after the applicants failed to attend multiple hearings in the proceedings, Schmidt J made orders dismissing the applicants' notices of motion and statement of claim. The applicants sought leave to appeal against orders which they claimed were made by Schmidt J on 23 June 2011. On 29 September 2011, after giving the applicants an opportunity to amend their application for leave to appeal, which the applicants declined to take, the Court of Appeal dismissed the application on the basis that Schmidt J had not made orders of the type sought to be appealed against on 23 June 2011.
As the applicants are unrepresented, the application falls to be dealt with under r 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004.
The applicant's written submissions do not advance any questions of law which would justify a grant of special leave to appeal. There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court of Appeal below.
Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
K.M. Hayne
9 February 2012S.M. Crennan
- AGLC
- Li Wang & Anor v State of New South Wales [2012] HCASL 10
- Case
- [2012] HCASL 10
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the Court was whether the applicants' written submissions contained any questions of law that would justify the grant of special leave to appeal. The Court considered that the applicants' submissions did not advance any questions of law that would warrant such leave. The Court found no reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision and concluded that the applicants' application should be dismissed.
The Court held that the applicants' written submissions did not contain any questions of law that would justify the grant of special leave to appeal. The Court found no reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision and concluded that the applicants' application should be dismissed. The Court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The Court considered that the applicants' submissions did not advance any questions of law that would warrant the grant of special leave to appeal.
Pursuant to rule 41.10.5 of the High Court Rules 2004, the Court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The order was made on 9 February 2012 by K.M. Hayne and S.M. Crennan.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.