MacKenzie v Minister for Natural Resources and Mines

Case [2005] QLC 48


LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: MacKenzie v Minister for Natural Resources and Mines  [2005] QLC 0048
PARTIES: David James MacKenzie
(applicant)
v.
Minister for Natural Resources and Mines
(respondent)
FILE NO: LA2005/1010
DIVISION: Land Court of Queensland
PROCEEDING: In the matter of an application for a declaration under Section 33(1)(a) of the Land Court Act 2000 ordering the respondent to complete the internal review of a decision refusing a tree clearing permit pursuant to Part 3 of Division 2 of the Land Act 1994.
DELIVERED ON: 15 September 2005
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARD: On the papers without an oral hearing:  Rule 36 of the Land Court Rules 2000.
MEMBER: The President
ORDERS:

1. The application for a declaration under s.33(1)(a) of the Land Court Act 2000 is granted.

2.         The respondent is to complete the internal review and communicate the result of and the reasons for the decision to the applicant by 4.00 p.m. on 29 September 2005.

3.         The respondent will pay the applicant's costs in the amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) by 4.00 p.m. on 29 September 2005.

CATCHWORDS: Practice and Procedure - Application for a declaration - Appeal against refusal of tree clearing application - No review decision - Land Court Act s.33(1)(a); Land Act 1994 s.426
SUBMISSIONS BY: Mr P Sheridan for the applicant
Mr M Heather for the respondent
  1. This matter concerns an application to the Court for a declaration and orders that the respondent complete an internal review of a decision refusing an application by the applicant for a tree clearing permit.

Background

  1. In October 2001 the applicant submitted an application for a tree clearing permit pursuant to Part 6 of the Land Act 1994. On 7 July 2004, the applicant received a notice that his application for a tree clearing permit had been refused. On 20 August 2004, the applicant requested an internal review of the decision to refuse the permit pursuant to Part 3, Division 2 of the Land Act 1994.  As at the date of the present application, the internal review had not been completed.

Relief Sought

  1. The applicant seeks a declaration and orders that the respondent complete the internal review and that the decision be communicated to the applicant within 14 days of the order of the Court.

  2. The application was set down for hearing on 15 October 2005. 

  3. On 14 October 2005, the parties agreed that this matter be determined by consent and agreed to the following orders.

Orders

1.The application for a declaration under s.33(1)(a) of the Land Court Act 2000 is granted.

2.The respondent is to complete the internal review and communicate the result of and the reasons for the decision to the applicant by 4.00 p.m. on 29 September 2005.

3.The respondent will pay the applicant's costs in the amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) by 4.00 p.m. on 29 September 2005.

JJ TRICKETT

PRESIDENT OF THE LAND COURT

Details
AGLC
MacKenzie v Minister for Natural Resources and Mines [2005] QLC 48
Case
[2005] QLC 48
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, MacKenzie, brought an action against the Minister for Natural Resources and Mines following the refusal of an application to clear trees on their property. The case was heard in the Land Court of Queensland, which was required to determine whether the refusal was subject to an internal review process and whether the Minister was obligated to provide reasons for the refusal. The applicant sought a declaration under section 33(1)(a) of the Land Court Act 2000, which permits the court to declare the rights of any person in relation to land.

The court needed to address two main issues. First, whether the refusal of the tree clearing application was subject to an internal review as per section 426 of the Land Act 1994. Second, whether the Minister was required to provide reasons for the refusal under the same statute. The applicant argued that the refusal was subject to review and that the Minister was obligated to provide reasons for the decision. The Minister contended that the refusal was not subject to review and that no reasons were required.

The court found that the refusal of the tree clearing application was indeed subject to an internal review process as outlined in section 426 of the Land Act 1994. The court further determined that the Minister was required to provide reasons for the refusal, in line with the statutory obligations. Consequently, the court granted the application for a declaration under section 33(1)(a) of the Land Court Act 2000. The Minister was directed to complete the internal review and communicate the result and the reasons for the decision to the applicant by 4.00 p.m. on 29 September 2005. Additionally, the Minister was ordered to pay the applicant's costs in the amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) by the same deadline.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The application for a declaration under s.33(1)(a) of the Land Court Act 2000 is granted.

2. The respondent is to complete the internal review and communicate the result of and the reasons for the decision to the applicant by 4.00 p.m. on 29 September 2005.

3. The respondent will pay the applicant's costs in the amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) by 4.00 p.m. on 29 September 2005.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.