MAO
v
BT FUNDS MANAGEMENT LIMITED & ORS
[2022] HCASL 100
S20/2022
The applicant requires an extension of time to seek special leave to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision. Further, it would not be in the interests of the administration of justice to grant special leave to appeal. Thus, there is no utility in granting the extension of time.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
S.J Gageler J.S Gleeson 12 May 2022
- AGLC
- Mao v BT Funds Management Limited [2022] HCASL 100
- Case
- [2022] HCASL 100
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in this case primarily revolve around whether there is a valid reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision, and if granting special leave to appeal would be in the interests of the administration of justice. The Court was also required to determine whether granting an extension of time to seek special leave to appeal would be appropriate in this case.
In reaching its decision, the Court found that there is no reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision, and that granting special leave to appeal would not be in the interests of the administration of justice. As a result, the Court determined that there is no utility in granting the extension of time. The Court relied on rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth) to dismiss the application. The Court's decision was based on a careful consideration of the relevant legal principles and the facts of the case.
Pursuant to rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), the Court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The Court's decision was made on May 12, 2022.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.