Martin v The Queen (No. 2)

Case [2013] NSWCCA 26


Court of Criminal Appeal

New South Wales

Case Title: Martin v R (No. 2)
Medium Neutral Citation: [2013] NSWCCA 26
Hearing Date(s): 27 November 2012
Decision Date: 26 February 2013
Before: Hoeben JA, Davies & Campbell JJ
Decision:

Order 4 made 13 December 2012 is varied so that paragraph (a) provides:

In respect of Count 2 a non-parole period of 12 months commencing 30 July 2012 and expiring 29 July 2013 with an additional term of 9 months expiring 29 April 2014.

Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Rules
Cases Cited: R v Brett Andrew Green [2011] NSWCCA 71
Category: Procedural and other rulings
Parties: Ronald George Martin (Applicant)
Crown
Representation
- Counsel: Counsel:
I McLachlan (Applicant)
M Cinque (Crown)
- Solicitors: Solicitors:
Legal Aid NSW (Applicant)
Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown)
File Number(s): 2010/107331 & 2010/228092
Decision Under Appeal
- Before: Garling DCJ
- Date of Decision:  25 August 2011
- Court File Number(s): 2010/107331 & 2010/228092

JUDGMENT

  1. THE COURT: On 13 December 2012 the Court allowed the appeal, quashed the sentences imposed by Judge Garling in respect of the second set of offences and in lieu made the following order relating to Count 2:

    (a) In respect of Count 2 a non-parole period of 12 months commencing 30 July 2012 and expiring 29 July 2013 with an additional term of 9 months expiring 29 March 2014.

  2. The reference to the additional term of 9 months expiring 29 March 2014 was an error that did not reflect the Court's intention in imposing an additional term of 9 months. It is necessary, therefore, to amend the sentence in respect of Count 2 in order that the sentence passed on the Appellant conform with the intention of the Court.

  3. The error was not brought to the Court's attention within the 14 day period allowed by r 50C of the Criminal Appeal Rules. Independently of r 50C this Court has inherent power to make corrections of accidental slips or omissions in order to ensure that orders finally made reflect the intention of the Court: R v Brett Andrew Green [2011] NSWCCA 71 at [21] and [24].

  4. Accordingly, the order of the Court of 13 December 2012 is corrected as follows:

    Order 4 made 13 December 2012 is varied so that paragraph (a) provides:

    In respect of Count 2 a non-parole period of 12 months commencing 30 July 2012 and expiring 29 July 2013 with an additional term of 9 months expiring 29 April 2014.

    **********

Details
AGLC
Martin v The Queen (No. 2) [2013] NSWCCA 26
Case
[2013] NSWCCA 26
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Ronald George Martin sought leave to appeal against the sentence imposed by Judge Garling. The appeal was heard by Hoeben JA, Davies and Campbell JJ of the Court of Criminal Appeal in New South Wales. The central issue before the court was whether to correct an error in the sentence imposed on the appellant, Ronald George Martin, by Judge Garling. The appeal arose from an error in the sentence regarding the non-parole period and the additional term for Count 2. The original sentence stated an additional term of 9 months expiring on 29 March 2014, which did not align with the court's intention. The court had to determine whether it had the authority to correct this error and amend the sentence to reflect its true intention.

The court found that it had the inherent power to correct errors in sentencing to ensure the final order accurately reflected its intention, even beyond the 14-day period allowed by rule 50C of the Criminal Appeal Rules. The court referred to the case of R v Brett Andrew Green, which established that the court can make corrections to accidental slips or omissions. The court concluded that it was necessary to amend the sentence to correctly state the additional term of 9 months expiring on 29 April 2014. Therefore, the order of the court of 13 December 2012 was varied to reflect this correction.

The Court of Criminal Appeal varied the sentence so that the non-parole period for Count 2 would commence on 30 July 2012 and expire on 29 July 2013, with an additional term of 9 months expiring on 29 April 2014. This amendment ensured that the sentence conformed to the court's original intention.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.