Supreme Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: National Australia Bank Limited v Qasim [2021] NSWSC 897 Hearing dates: 23 July 2021 Date of orders: 23 July 2021 Decision date: 23 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Lonergan J Decision: Orders set out at [9]
Catchwords: PROCEDURE – referral to pro bono legal service – application granted - reasons
Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Category: Procedural rulings Parties: National Australia Bank Limited (Plaintiff)
Shaheen Qasim (Defendant)Representation: Counsel
Solicitors
R Rositano, Dentons
Self-represented (Defendant)
Dentons (Plaintiff)
Self-represented (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2019/158890 Publication restriction: Nil
REVISED EX TEMPORE Judgment
-
HER HONOUR: These proceedings were commenced by statement of claim on 21 May 2019. The defendant, Ms Qasim, appears for herself today, and has so far, it seems, defended the proceedings without the assistance of legal advice. Ms Qasim tells me today that she would be willing to avail herself of pro bono assistance.
-
The background to the matter is that the National Australia Bank says that the defendant has defaulted on the loan secured by three properties, one in Old Bar and two in Randwick.
-
There are two Defences on the file, one dated 4 June 2021 and the other dated 5 July 2021. As pointed out by Ms Rositano, neither of those Defences raise matters responsive to the Statement of Claim and an application has been made that they be struck out. I accede to that application because neither defence sets out any basis upon which the claim could be defended. There is simply no valid matter raised in either document.
-
There are other documents that have been filed by the defendant that also lead me to the view that Ms Qasim needs assistance. There are two “Notice to Plead Facts - Money Claims” (form 16 under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 14.12(2)) which also, by their content and form, indicate a lack of understanding by the defendant as to the issues relevant to the possession proceedings that are before the Common Law Division of this Court.
-
I note that there are large sums involved in the secured loan. I also note that the proceedings have stalled to some extent, I have been informed, because of complaints made to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority which I have been informed today, are now complete.
-
I accept that the plaintiff wishes the matter to proceed now as quickly as is practicable, but am of the view the matter will continue to be stalled if the defendant does not get legal assistance.
-
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 7.36 makes provision for referral to a barrister or solicitor if I am satisfied certain circumstances apply. I need to consider whether the person in question has adequate means to pay for a solicitor, her capacity to obtain legal assistance outside the scheme, the nature and complexity of the proceedings and any other matter I consider appropriate.
-
It is my view that this matter is complex. It has been demonstrated that the defendant needs assistance to manage that complexity. I am satisfied that Ms Qasim has lost her earnings as a medical practitioner and so would have difficulty paying a lawyer and I consider that it is in the interests of justice to make an order referring her for pro bono legal assistance in accordance with this rule.
-
I therefore make the following orders in the matter generally:
The defendant is referred to the Registrar for referral to a solicitor or barrister on the pro bono panel for legal assistance, including advice in relation to the proceedings and, in particular, the drafting of a valid Defence, and to assist with representation through the next stages of the proceedings.
The Defences dated 4 June 2021 and 5 July 2021 are struck out.
The defendant is not granted leave at this stage to file her Notice of Motion dated 8 July 2021 as the defendant needs legal assistance to frame appropriate orders.
The defendant is to prepare and provide a copy of her proposed draft Amended Defence to the solicitors for the plaintiff on or before 17 September 2021.
I list the matter for directions before me at 9am on Friday 24 September 2021.
**********
Amendments
17 September 2021 - Par 9, order (5) - amended date from 4 September to 24 September.
- AGLC
- National Australia Bank Limited v Qasim [2021] NSWSC 897
- Case
- [2021] NSWSC 897
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered several factors in its decision. It noted that Qasim was experiencing significant financial hardship and had limited legal resources available to him. The court also acknowledged that the referral could provide Qasim with the necessary legal assistance to address his financial difficulties effectively. Furthermore, the court recognised that a referral to a pro bono legal service could promote access to justice and ensure that individuals in similar situations receive appropriate legal support. Based on these considerations, the court concluded that it was appropriate to refer Qasim's case to a probono legal service. The application was therefore granted, and the reasons for the decision were provided in the judgment.
The court ordered that Qasim's case be referred to a pro bono legal service to assist him with his financial difficulties. The referral was made under section 46BA of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, and the court considered it to be in the interests of justice. The decision highlighted the importance of providing legal assistance to individuals experiencing financial hardship and the role of pro bono legal services in promoting access to justice. The outcome of the case underscored the court's commitment to ensuring that all parties have the opportunity to receive appropriate legal support, regardless of their financial circumstances.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.