Niroula (Migration) [2021] AATA 1731 (24 May 2021)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr Binod Niroula
CASE NUMBER: 2005816
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S): BCC2019/4764669
MEMBER:Tim Connellan
DATE:24 May 2021
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
Statement made on 24 May 2021 at 1:20pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – English language ability – result of specified test provided to tribunal – decision under review remittedLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 65, 360(2)(a)
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 2, cl 500.213
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The applicant applied for the visa on 23 September 2019. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 4 March 2020.
The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of English language ability was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
On 25 August 2020 the Tribunal received a submission which included the result of a Pearson Test of English (PTE) Academic taken on 20 August 2020 in which the applicant achieved an overall score of 45.
In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.
In reaching its decision the Tribunal did not consider a hearing to be necessary, as it was able to find in favour of the applicant on the basis of the material before it, pursuant to s.360(2)(a) of the Act.
DECISION
The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
Tim Connellan
Member
- AGLC
- Niroula (Migration) [2021] AATA 1731
- Case
- [2021] AATA 1731
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was to determine if Mr. Niroula satisfied the criteria for the Subclass 500 visa, specifically in relation to his English language proficiency, based on the evidence provided.
The Tribunal determined that a hearing was not necessary, as it could find in favour of the applicant based on the material already before it, pursuant to section 360(2)(a) of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth). Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the application for reconsideration with a direction that Mr. Niroula meets the criteria specified in clause 500.213 of Schedule 2 to the *Migration Regulations 1994* (Cth).
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.