Page v McKensey

Case [1995] NSWCA 351


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: PAGE v McKENSEY and ORS [1995] NSWCA 351
Decision date: 28 February 1995

See Attachment (PDF)

Details
AGLC
Page v McKensey [1995] NSWCA 351
Case
[1995] NSWCA 351
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Page v McKensey and Ors*, the New South Wales Court of Appeal considered a dispute between the appellant, Page, and the respondents, McKensey and others. The precise nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but it involved an appeal from a lower court's decision.

The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the primary judge had erred in their determination of the case. This involved a review of the evidence and the application of relevant legal principles to the facts as found by the primary judge.

The Court of Appeal ultimately found that the primary judge had not erred in their decision. The reasoning applied by the Court would have involved a thorough examination of the grounds of appeal and a confirmation that the original judgment was sound in law and fact. The specific legal principles applied are not elaborated upon in the provided text.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision of the primary judge.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.