Pritchard, Gemma Narelle v Sucata Pty Ltd

Case [1997] FCA 1297

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Pritchard, Gemma Narelle v Sucata Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 1297

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Re McJannet; Ex parte Australian Workers' Union of Employees (Qld) (No 2) [1997] HCA 40
Citation 1

…This provision was considered by the High Court of Australia in Re McJannet; ex parte Australian Workers’ Union of Employees (1997) 146 ALR 569. At 570 Brennan CJ, McHugh and Gummow JJ said:…
Grout v Gunnedah Shire Council (No 3) [1995] IRCA 117
Citation 2

…I think this submission is correct. It accords with the view taken by Moore J in Grout v Gunnedah Shire Council (1995) 129 ALR 372 at 377-385, a decision that follows two earlier decisions of Gray J. The point is fully explained by Moore J in Grout and I am content to adopt that explanation.…
Fencott v Muller [1983] HCA 12
Citation 3

…of contract, s 347 would not apply. But he says there is only one “matter”; that is, one “single justiciable controversy”: Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 at 608. This “matter” involved a claim under the Act; accordingly, Ms Pritchard’s action is “a proceeding ... in a matter arising under the Act”, notwithstandi…

AI Chat isn't available for this judgment.