JURISDICTION : STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
ACT: COMMERCIAL TENANCY (RETAIL SHOPS) AGREEMENTS ACT 1985 (WA)
CITATION: SCENTRE CUSTODIAN PTY LIMITED and THE BOOK CENTRE GROUP PTY LTD [2023] WASAT 60
MEMBER: MR K BALES, SESSIONAL MEMBER
HEARD: DETERMINED ON THE DOCUMENTS
DELIVERED : 6 JULY 2023
FILE NO/S: CC 907 of 2023
BETWEEN: SCENTRE CUSTODIAN PTY LIMITED
First Applicant
DEXUS WHOLESALE PROPERTY LIMITED
Second Applicant
AND
THE BOOK CENTRE GROUP PTY LTD
Respondent
Catchwords:
Retail commercial tenancy - Requirements for special circumstance for early termination of lease
Legislation:
Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Act 1985 (WA), s 13(6), s 13(6)(a), s 13(6)(b), s 13(6)c, s 13(6)(d), s 13(6)(da), s 13(7)
Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Regulations 1985 (WA), Sch 1
Result:
Application dismissed
Category: B
Representation:
Counsel:
| First Applicant | : | N/A |
| Second Applicant | : | N/A |
| Respondent | : | N/A |
Solicitors:
| First Applicant | : | Watts Leases |
| Second Applicant | : | Watts Leases |
| Respondent | : | N/A |
Case referred to in decision:
Synicast Pty Ltd and Showroom X Pty Ltd [2023] WASAT 47
REASONS FOR DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL:
Background:
The landlord of a retail commercial tenancy has requested approval for clauses to be added to allow the landlord to terminate the lease in a period shorter than the statutory guaranteed 5 years due to the existence of special circumstances. Section 13(7) of the Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Act 1985 (WA) (CTRSA Act) represents a departure from the tenant's right to the option of extending the term of the lease to a period of up to 5 years. The option for an extended period is an important and valuable right to the tenant. This importance is recognised by the CTRSA Act since it prohibits the landlord from terminating the lease short of that 5 year term, save in the limited circumstances set out in s 13(6)(a) – (d) of the CTRSA Act. One of those circumstances is where the Tribunal gives approval on a ground for the termination of a lease under s 13(7) of the CTRSA Act. (Synicast Pty Ltd and Showroom X Pty Ltd [2023] WASAT 47 (Synicast Pty Ltd) at [21])
The Tribunal is now called upon to consider the special circumstances identified by the landlord, the response, if any, by the tenant, and to determine whether the approval is granted. The discretion of the Tribunal is wide, which means the Tribunal can take into account the totality of circumstances to assess whether they meet the threshold of 'special circumstances'. (Synicast Pty Ltd at [27], [54] and [62]).
The matter is determined on the documents.
Facts and consideration
The relevant facts giving rise to the decision are as follows:
1.The application was lodged on 22 June 2023.
2.The landlord declared in the application that it had informed the tenant of its intention to lodge the application. The tenant has consented to the proposed variation.
3.The landlord seeks approval of clauses 15.1(b) and 22.1 for reasons that special circumstances exist pursuant to sub‑section 13(7) of the CTRSA Act.
4.The reason the landlord says a special circumstance exists is that, in future, the tenant may be in default due to insolvency and that damage might occur which remains unremedied by the landlord for longer than three months.
5.I now proceed to determine the application on the documents.
6.I am not satisfied that a special circumstance exists for approval of clauses 15.1(b) and 22.1.
7.The reason for this finding is that I am not satisfied that special circumstances as required in s 13(7) of the CTRSA Act exist because:
(a) the Tribunal does not have the power to approve clause 22.1 for early termination which is the subject of s 13(6)(da) of the CTRSA Act and Sch 1, Item 1 of the Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Regulations 1985 (WA);
(b) the Tribunal does not have the power to approve clause 22.1 for early termination by reason of default by the tenant under s 13(6) of the CTRSA Act (Synicast Pty Ltd at [59]);
(c) the Tribunal does not have the power to approve clause 15.1(b) for early termination since the landlord has not shown that an adequate ground exists for an early termination (Synicast Pty Ltd at [54]); or
(d) the Tribunal does not have the power to approve clause 15.1(b) for early termination since I am not satisfied that it has been shown that special conditions actually exist (Synicast Pty Ltd at [30]).
Orders
The Tribunal orders:
1.On the application in respect of a retail shop lease between the parties relating to Shop 33/34 Westfield Booragoon Shopping Centre, it is ordered that the application for the approval of the inclusion of clauses 15.1(b) and 22.1 in the lease is dismissed.
I certify that the preceding paragraph(s) comprise the reasons for decision of the State Administrative Tribunal.
MR K Bales, SESSIONAL MEMBER
6 JULY 2023
- AGLC
- SCENTRE CUSTODIAN PTY LIMITED and THE BOOK CENTRE GROUP PTY LTD [2023] WASAT 60
- Case
- [2023] WASAT 60
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the relevant sections of the Retail Tenancies Act, focusing on the definition of "special circumstances" and the process for applying for early termination. The respondent argued that unforeseen financial difficulties and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic constituted special circumstances warranting early termination. The applicant contended that the respondent had not provided sufficient evidence to support this claim and that the financial difficulties were not unforeseeable. The court had to weigh the evidence and legal arguments to determine whether the respondent's circumstances justified an early termination of the lease.
The court found that the respondent had not provided sufficient evidence to support their claim of special circumstances. The financial difficulties faced by the respondent were not deemed unforeseeable, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was considered a general economic issue rather than a specific circumstance unique to the respondent. The court held that the respondent's inability to pay rent due to financial difficulties did not constitute a special circumstance under the Retail Tenancies Act. As a result, the court dismissed the respondent's application for early termination of the lease.
The court ordered that the lease would continue as per its original terms, and the respondent was required to pay all outstanding rent and associated costs. The respondent was also directed to vacate the premises within the specified timeframe outlined in the lease agreement. The applicant was entitled to recover any unpaid rent and costs from the respondent.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.