Shannon & Anor v Steinmetz

Case [2019] HCASL 332

SHANNON & ANOR
v

STEINMETZ

[2019] HCASL 332
S180/2019

  1. The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (White and Brereton JJA and Simpson AJA) which turned on the application of established principle. The appeal proposed by the applicant would enjoy insufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave. Accordingly, special leave to appeal should be refused.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.

S.J. Gageler
16 October 2019 		P.A. Keane
Details
AGLC
Shannon & Anor v Steinmetz [2019] HCASL 332
Case
[2019] HCASL 332
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Shannon & Anor v Steinmetz, the applicants sought special leave to appeal a decision rendered by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The case primarily revolved around the interpretation and application of established legal principles within the context of the applicants' appeal. The Court of Appeal had previously ruled against the applicants, and they now sought to challenge this decision by appealing to the High Court of Australia.

The primary legal issues that the Court of Appeal had to address were centered on the interpretation and application of certain established legal principles. The applicants argued that the Court of Appeal had misapplied these principles, leading to an unjust outcome. They sought to have the High Court review the case and potentially overturn the lower court's decision. However, the High Court needed to determine whether the appeal had sufficient merit to warrant the granting of special leave.

The High Court, in considering the application for special leave, concluded that the appeal did not have sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave. The Court found that the legal issues raised by the applicants were not sufficiently compelling or novel to merit further consideration at the High Court level. The Court of Appeal's interpretation and application of the established principles were deemed to be correct, and thus the applicants' proposed appeal was unlikely to succeed.

Consequently, the High Court refused the application for special leave to appeal. Pursuant to the High Court Rules, the Registrar was directed to prepare, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application with costs. This decision effectively upheld the ruling of the Court of Appeal and concluded the applicants' bid to appeal the case to a higher court.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.