SUPPIAH
v
THE QUEEN
[2019] HCASL 42
A34/2018
The applicant requires an extension of time within which to file this application for special leave to appeal. The proposed grounds of appeal from the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of South Australia (Kourakis CJ, Blue J and Hinton J) would not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal. It would therefore be futile to grant the extension that is sought. The application should be dismissed.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
M.M Gordon J.J Edelman 13 March 2019
- AGLC
- Suppiah v The Queen [2019] HCASL 42
- Case
- [2019] HCASL 42
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court held that the proposed grounds of appeal would not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal. The court found that it would be futile to grant the extension that was sought, as the prospects of success for the appeal were minimal. The court emphasised that special leave to appeal should only be granted if there is a reasonable possibility that the appeal will succeed.
The court dismissed the application for an extension of time and the application for special leave to appeal. The court found that it would be futile to grant the extension sought by the applicant, as the proposed grounds of appeal did not have sufficient prospects of success. The court emphasised that the grant of special leave to appeal should only be made in cases where there is a reasonable possibility that the appeal will succeed.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The court's decision was made on 13 March 2019 by M.M Gordon and J.J Edelman.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.