ACT CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
THE OWNERS - UNITS PLAN 371 v NABUA & ANOR (Civil Dispute) [2018] ACAT 29
XD 637/2016
Catchwords: CIVIL DISPUTE – unpaid levies – owners corporation incurred expenses when taking action to recover unpaid levies – whether it was reasonable for the relevant owners corporation to incur the expenses claimed – whether it is reasonable for the second or third arrears letters to be double the price of the first arrears letter – whether the amount for a fixed charge to commence legal action is reasonable
Cases cited:The Owners – Unit Plan No 3182 v Black and Anor [2018] ACAT 6
Tribunal: Senior Member H Robinson
Date of Orders: 20 March 2018
Date of Reasons for Decision: 20 March 2018
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY )
CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ) XD 637/2016
BETWEEN:
THE OWNERS - UNITS PLAN 371
Applicant
AND:
HECTOR MARK NABUA
First Respondent
THERESE RESTON TAMPIPI
Second Respondent
TRIBUNAL: Senior Member H Robinson
DATE:20 March 2018
ORDER
The Tribunal orders that:
Within 28 days the respondent pay the applicant the amount of $1365.40
………………………………..
Senior Member H Robinson
REASONS FOR DECISION
These reasons should be read as supplementary to the Tribunal’s reasons in The Owners – Unit Plan No 3182 v Black and Anor [2018] ACAT 6 (Black).
The respondent was ordered to pay the applicant to sum of $1,680.50 for unpaid levies, interest and the application fee. Additionally, the applicant claimed the following expenses:
Arrears letter 2nd reminder $55.00 Arrears letter 3rd reminder $110.00 Commencement of legal action $500.00 Demand letter $37.40 Issue debt application $396.00 Default judgment application $165.00 Judgment assessment hearing $220.00 Phone/email demand $55.00 Register ACAT judgment $66.00 Serve judgment order on debtor $66.00 Total $1,670.40
It is acknowledged that paralegal staff, amongst others, undertook significant work for which no payment was sought.
Taking into account the guiding principles outlined in Black, the Tribunal accepts that it was reasonable for the corporation to:
(a)engage an agent to take steps to recover the debt;
(b)issue proceedings; and
(c)recover the enforcement costs of previous proceedings against the same debtor in this proceeding.
The next question is whether the amount of the expenses claimed are reasonable.
This matter raises the same issues in relation to the escalating cost of arrears letters and the $500.00 fee for the commencement of legal action as The Owners – Units Plan No 1565 v Ruff [2018] ACAT 31. The Tribunal adopts the same reasoning in this case. The Tribunal allows $250.00 for the management fee and $55.00 for each of the arrears letters.
The legal costs claimed for issuing the debt application, default judgment, assessment hearing, registering and serving the judgment are allowed in full as the Tribunal considers these costs to be reasonable for the reasons set out in Black.
The Tribunal therefore allows the sum of $1,365.40 for expenses under section 31 of the Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011 in this matter.
………………………………..
Senior Member H Robinson
- AGLC
- The Owners Units Plan 371 v Nabua and Anor (Civil Dispute) [2018] ACAT 29
- Case
- [2018] ACAT 29
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Tribunal were whether the respondents were indeed liable for the unpaid strata levies, and if so, to what extent, and whether the applicants were entitled to additional costs and interest as claimed. The Tribunal had to consider the terms of the strata plan, relevant legislation, and any agreements or communications between the parties regarding the levies.
The Tribunal examined the evidence presented by both parties, including the strata plan provisions and the financial records. It determined that the respondents were indeed liable for the unpaid levies as per the strata plan. The Tribunal found that the applicants were entitled to the claimed amount of unpaid levies, along with a portion of the interest and costs. The Tribunal did not award the full amount of interest and costs claimed by the applicants, finding some of the expenses to be excessive or not adequately substantiated. The Tribunal ordered that the respondents pay the applicants the amount of $1365.40 within 28 days.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Tribunal orders that:
1.
Within 28 days the respondent pay the applicant the amount of $1365.40
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.