ACT CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
THE OWNERS – UNITS PLAN NO 3802 v ILHAN (Civil Dispute) [2018] ACAT 28
XD 876/2016
Catchwords: CIVIL DISPUTE – unpaid levies – owners corporation incurred expenses when taking action to recover unpaid levies – whether it was reasonable for the relevant owners corporation to incur the expenses claimed – whether engagement of a local law firm to file documents is recoverable – whether the cost of preparing the debt application and negotiating the consent judgment is reasonable
Cases cited:The Owners – Unit Plan No 3182 vBlack and Anor [2018] ACAT 6
The Owners –Units Plan No 546 v Donnelly & Anor [2018] ACAT 27
Tribunal: Senior Member H Robinson
Date of Orders: 20 March 2018
Date of Reasons for Decision: 20 March 2018
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY )
CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ) XD 876/2016
BETWEEN:
THE OWNERS – UNITS PLAN NO 3802
Applicant
AND:
MUSTAFA SENCER ILHAN
Respondent
TRIBUNAL: Senior Member H Robinson
DATE:20 March 2018
ORDER
The Tribunal orders that:
1. Within 28 days the respondent pay the applicant the amount of $606.50
………………………………..
Senior Member H Robinson
REASONS FOR DECISION
1.These reasons should be read as supplementary to the Tribunal’s reasons in The Owners – Unit Plan No 3182 v Black and Anor [2018] ACAT 6 (Black).
2.At the substantive hearing, the respondent was ordered to pay the applicant the sum of $5,209.76. The Tribunal notes the advice of the lawyers retained in that matter, Kerin Benson, that the amount of the judgment included the ACAT filing fee of $290.00; the cost of a title search totalling $39.05 and legal costs incurred in issuing a letter of demand totalling $55.00.
3.The following expenses were also claimed:
Balance of legal costs to issue debt application and file consent orders $606.50
Legal agent filing fee $22.00 Total $628.50 4.Taking into account the guiding principles outlined in Black, the Tribunal accepts that it was reasonable to incur the costs as itemised, save for the legal agent filing fee of $22.00. For the reasons set out in relation The Owners -Units Plan No 546 v Donnelly & Anor [2018] ACAT 27 the Tribunal considers it was unnecessary for an agent to attend the Tribunal to file the claim for default judgment in person as the Tribunal allows claims and applications to be filed by post and this is the most efficient way to attend to filing.
5.The legal costs claimed for issuing the debt application, and negotiating the consent judgment are allowed in full as the Tribunal considers these costs to be reasonable taking into account the considerations outlined in Black.
6.The legal agent filing fee costs of $22 are disallowed. Therefore, the Tribunal allows expenses in the sum of $606.50.
………………………………..
Senior Member H Robinson
- AGLC
- The Owners Units Plan No 3802 v Ilhan (Civil Dispute) [2018] ACAT 28
- Case
- [2018] ACAT 28
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Tribunal were whether the levies were indeed due and payable by Ilhan and, if so, whether the body corporate was entitled to recover them. The Tribunal had to examine the terms of the body corporate’s rules and the strata scheme to ascertain the obligations of the unit owners. Additionally, the Tribunal needed to assess whether any defences Ilhan had put forward were valid and whether the body corporate had followed the appropriate procedures in seeking to recover the levies.
In its decision, the Tribunal confirmed that the levies were indeed due and payable by Ilhan as per the body corporate’s rules and the strata scheme. The Tribunal found that Ilhan had failed to provide any evidence to counter the body corporate’s claim or to show that any defences he had raised were valid. Consequently, the Tribunal determined that the body corporate was entitled to recover the unpaid levies. The amount owed was calculated based on the levies that had accrued and the Tribunal ordered that Ilhan pay the specified sum within 28 days.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Tribunal orders that:
1. Within 28 days the respondent pay the applicant the amount of $606.50
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.