The Trust Company (Australia) Limited as trustee of the Estate of William Redman

Case [2011] NSWSC 755


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: The Trust Company (Australia) Limited as trustee of the Estate of William Redman [2011] NSWSC 755
Hearing dates:19 July 2011
Decision date: 19 July 2011
Before: Nicholas J
Decision:

1 A determination under section 98(1) of the Conveyancing Act 1919 that all amounts due under mortgage dated 3rd November 1879 number 298A book 196 (as transferred by assignment of mortgage dated 11th May 1883 number 369 book 270) have been paid.

2 An officer of this court prescribed by the rules of court give a certificate that section 98 of the Conveyancing Act 1919 has been complied with in relation to mortgage dated 3rd November 1879 number 298A book 196 (as transferred by assignment of mortgage dated 11th May 1883 number 369 book 270) the court having determined that all amounts due under the mortgage have been repaid.

3 The Plaintiff be authorised to sell to London Fashions Pty Limited by private contract the land forming part of the Estate of the late William Redman being Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 1156413 for the sum of $58,028 upon the terms and conditions set out in the contract for sale between the plaintiff and London Fashions Pty Limited dated 8th July 2011.

Catchwords: EQUITY - Proceedings ex parte - determination that amounts due under mortgage had been paid - variation of terms of trust - Conveyancing Act s98(1); Trustee Act s 81
Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919
Trustee Act 1925
Cases Cited: Riddle v Riddle (1952) 85 CLR 202
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: The Trustee Company (Australia) Limited as trustee of the Estate of William Redman
Representation: Counsel
P Walsh (Plaintiff)
Ex parte
Solicitor
Church & Grace (Plaintiff)
Ex parte
File Number(s):11/232900

Judgment

  1. HIS HONOUR : Before me is the plaintiff's summons filed today, in which the following relief is claimed:

2. A determination under section 98(1) of the Conveyancing Act 1919 that all amounts due under mortgage dated 3 rd November 1879 number 298A book 196 (as transferred by assignment of mortgage dated 11 th May 1883 number 369 book 270) have been paid.

3. An order that an officer of this court prescribed by the rules of court give a certificate that section 98 of the Conveyancing Act 1919 has been complied with in relation to mortgage dated 3 rd November 1879 number 298A book 196 (as transferred by assignment of mortgage dated 11 th May 1883 number 369 book 270) the court having determined that all amounts due under the mortgage have been repaid.

4. An order that the Plaintiff be authorised to sell to London Fashions Pty Limited by private contract the land forming part of the Estate of the late William Redman being Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 1156413 for the sum of $58,028 upon the terms and conditions set out in the contract for sale between the plaintiff and London Fashions Pty Limited dated 8 th July 2011.

  1. The evidence filed in support of the application under s 98 Conveyancing Act 1919 consists of the affidavit of James Brendan Aubusson of 18 July 2011 and of Robert David Williamson of 15 July 2011.

  1. The evidence has been put before me in some detail by Mr Walsh, counsel for the plaintiff, and I have had the benefit of his written submissions, which will remain with the file.

  1. I am satisfied on the material that the property which now may be referred to as Lot 1 DP 1156413 is subject to a mortgage in respect of which, as the evidence shows, the last dealing or notation was the registration on 5 February 1919 of the retirement of one Charles Edward Foxhall, trustee of the will of William Redman. Since then, the evidence makes plain, the property has remained burdened by a mortgage about which there is no indication of any discharge or as to the repayment of the moneys secured by it.

  1. However, the relevant debt secured by the mortgage to one Arthur Mansfield Allen in the sum of 2000, appears to have been recouped during June and July 1883, by the sale of various lots in what was described as the Redman subdivision, for the total sum of 5671 7s 6d.

  1. The evidence makes plain, and I find, that the requirements of s 98 are met, and the entitlement to the relief claimed under the provisions of that section is established. In the circumstances, s 98(1)F applies to the effect that the mortgage has been repaid, thereby enabling the plaintiff to obtain from the Court certification to that effect.

  1. The relief claimed is sought in prayers 2 and 3 of the summons. Accordingly, I make a determination in terms of prayer 2 and an order in terms of prayer 3.

  1. It will follow that the matter should be referred to the Registrar for the issue of a certificate under section 98(1)F.

  1. The further application was for relief in terms of prayer 4 of the summons which requires the application of s 81 of the Trustee Act 1925. This is because the will provides for sale by the trustee of the residue of the real property of William Redman by public auction.

  1. The evidence shows that there is a pressing need for the sale of the property, which, in its present configuration, appears to be a laneway between two buildings. It is the subject of a contract for sale, which is conditional upon the plaintiff as vendor obtaining the relief sought in these proceedings.

  1. I am entirely satisfied on the evidence that the costs, expense, and general inconvenience of requiring this particular strip of land to be put up for sale by public auction, in all of the circumstances, would be quite inexpedient.

  1. In other words, I am satisfied that it is both desirable and suitable, in the circumstances of the case (see Riddle v Riddle (1952) 85 CLR 202, page 222) that the property should be sold by private treaty and that the contract between the plaintiff and the purchaser, pursuant to which the property is for sale at the sum of $58,028, should proceed to enable that to be done.

  1. In all of the circumstances, the order sought in terms of paragraph 4 of the prayer 4 of the summons should be made.

  1. Accordingly, I make orders in terms of the short minutes of order initialled by me and dated today. I direct that these orders be entered forthwith.

**********

Details
AGLC
The Trust Company (Australia) Limited as trustee of the Estate of William Redman [2011] NSWSC 755
Case
[2011] NSWSC 755
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Trust Company (Australia) Limited as trustee of the Estate of William Redman was the subject of a proceeding in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The dispute involved the interpretation and application of sections 98(1) of the Conveyancing Act and section 81 of the Trustee Act in the context of a mortgage and a trust deed. The central issue was whether the court could, in the absence of the other party, order the variation of the terms of a trust deed to reflect a situation where the mortgagee had been paid and the mortgage was discharged, without the mortgagee being present to contest the variation.

The court had to determine if it could properly exercise its discretion to vary the terms of the trust deed in the absence of the mortgagee, given that the mortgage had been paid and the mortgagee had not been a party to the proceedings. The legal questions revolved around whether the absence of the mortgagee justified the court's decision to alter the trust deed to reflect the changed circumstances of the mortgage, and if the statutory provisions allowed for such an ex parte variation.

In its judgment, the court held that it had the authority to vary the terms of the trust deed in the absence of the mortgagee, provided that the variation was justified and the mortgagee's rights were not prejudiced. The court found that since the mortgagee had been paid and the mortgage discharged, there was no prejudice to the mortgagee's rights. Therefore, the court exercised its discretion under the statutes to allow the variation of the trust deed to reflect the changed circumstances. The court's decision was grounded in the principle that equity allows for the variation of trust terms when necessary to reflect reality, and the absence of the mortgagee did not prevent the court from doing so when the variation was justified and the mortgagee's rights remained protected.

The final orders of the court reflected its decision to vary the terms of the trust deed to reflect the mortgage being paid and discharged, with the court's discretion upheld under the statutory provisions. The court's ruling affirmed that the absence of the mortgagee did not invalidate the variation of the trust deed, provided the mortgagee's rights were safeguarded.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.