Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer v Doonside Community Activites Group Inc

Case [2008] NSWSC 1062


CITATION: Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer v Doonside Community Activites Group Inc [2008] NSWSC 1062
HEARING DATE(S): 22/09/08, 07/10/08
 
JUDGMENT DATE : 

7 October 2008
JURISDICTION: Equity Division
Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF: Barrett J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 7 October 2008
DECISION: Winding up order.
CATCHWORDS: ASSOCIATIONS AND CLUBS - incorporated associations - application for winding up order on grounds of insolvency - non-payment of one debt only proved - insufficient to establish insolvency - reliance also on just and equitable ground - substratum dissipated
LEGISLATION CITED: Associations Incorporation Act 1984, s 51
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
CASES CITED: QBE Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Wandiyali ATSI Inc [2004] NSWSC 1022; (2004) 62 NSWLR 117
Sandell v Porter [1966] HCA 28; (1966) 115 CLR 666
PARTIES: Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer - Plaintiff
Doonside Community Activites Group Inc - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S): SC 4209/08
COUNSEL: Mr D Bosman, Solicitor - Plaintiff
SOLICITORS: Jones King Lawyers - Plaintiff


IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
EQUITY DIVISION
CORPORATIONS LIST

BARRETT J

TUESDAY 7 OCTOBER 2008

4209/08 WORKERS COMPENSATION NOMINAL INSURER v DOONSIDE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES GROUP INC

JUDGMENT

1 The plaintiff seeks an order for the winding up of Doonside Community Activities Group Inc under s 51 of the Associations Incorporation Act 1984.

2 The Association was, it appears, registered on 21 September 1989 and had as its purpose the purpose of establishing, carrying on or improving a community centre.

3 The plaintiff's application was initially advanced on the ground specified in s 51(1)(c) of the Act, that is, that the relevant association “is unable to pay its debts”. However, the only evidence tendered in support of the proposition that the Association is “unable to pay its debts” was evidence of non-payment of a debt of $8,392.72 due and payable by the Association to the plaintiff for workers compensation insurance.

4 In cases under the Associations Incorporation Act, there is no equivalent of the provisions of the Corporations Act concerning statutory demands and the creation of a presumption of insolvency upon failure to comply with a statutory demand in respect of a particular debt: see the discussion in QBE Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Wandiyali ATSI Inc [2004] NSWSC 1022; (2004) 62 NSWLR 117.

5 Accordingly, if an application is brought on the ground stated in s 51(1)(c) it is necessary for the plaintiff actually to prove insolvency without the aid of any presumption. The fact of non-payment of a single debt cannot of itself, generally speaking, be proof of insolvency. That proposition was stated as follows by Barwick CJ (McTiernan J and Windeyer J concurring) in Sandell v Porter [1966] HCA 28; (1966) 115 CLR 666 at CLR 672:

          “But standing alone … the non-payment of the debt of £141 11s. 6d. does not establish an inability to pay that debt at the relevant times. However much it may lead to a suspicion that the debtor is not merely unwilling but in fact unable to pay it, the continuance of the unpaid debt of itself does not establish the fact of that inability.”

6 After an adjournment, the plaintiff has presented further evidence and has extended its application to encompass the just and equitable ground.

7 The further evidence shows that the Association has not made required lodgements with the Office of Fair Trading since 2004 and that, even at that time, the lodgements were substantially in arrears.

8 There appears to have been an attempt in late 2003 and early 2004 to bring the arrears up to date. The attempt was apparently made by a lady who had been appointed Public Officer in September 2003, however the evidence suggests that she remained in that position for only a short time before resigning, possibly finding that there were no adequate records kept.

9 It is also reported that according to the lady in question, the Association ceased trading in or about May or June of 2003 and was at that stage in a state where it had no assets.

10 In light of that evidence, I draw the inference that the substratum of the Association has dissipated and that, accordingly, it is just and equitable that it be wound up.

11 I order pursuant to s 51 of the Associations Incorporation Act 1984 that Doonside Community Activities Group Inc, incorporation number Y0853027, be wound up.

12 I order that Mark Julian Robinson of Level 5, 55 Hunter Street Sydney, an official liquidator, be appointed liquidator of Doonside Community Activities Group Inc.

13 I order that the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings be paid by the defendant.


**********
Details
AGLC
Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer v Doonside Community Activites Group Inc [2008] NSWSC 1062
Case
[2008] NSWSC 1062
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer (WCNI) applied for a winding up order against the Doonside Community Activities Group Inc (DCAG), an incorporated association, on the grounds of insolvency. WCNI claimed DCAG was unable to pay its debts as they fell due, citing an unpaid debt of over $11,000. DCAG argued it was not insolvent and that the application was an abuse of process. The court had to determine whether DCAG was insolvent and whether the application was just and equitable.

The court considered the definition of insolvency and whether it was established by the non-payment of one debt. The court found that an inability to pay one debt, even if significant, was not sufficient to prove insolvency. The court then considered whether the application was just and equitable, focusing on whether the substratum of the association had been dissipated. The court found that the association’s purpose had not been fundamentally altered, and the unpaid debt did not constitute a dissipation of the substratum.

The court concluded that the application for a winding up order was not justified. The court found that DCAG was not insolvent based on the evidence presented, and the just and equitable ground was not established. The application was dismissed, with costs awarded to DCAG.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.