YADU
v
ORJIT
[2022] HCASL 187
P16/2022
The applicant seeks special leave to appeal a decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) Appellate Jurisdiction (McClelland DCJ, Austin and Sutherland JJ), dismissing his appeal against the primary judge's decision to order that the applicant transfer property to the respondent.
The ground sought to be raised in the proposed appeal has no realistic prospect of success. Special leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.
S.J. Gageler S.H.P. Steward 20 October 2022
- AGLC
- Yadu v Orjit [2022] HCASL 187
- Case
- [2022] HCASL 187
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the merits of the applicant's proposed ground for appeal, which was related to the property transfer order. After careful consideration, the court found that the ground sought to be raised in the proposed appeal did not have a realistic prospect of success. The court concluded that the primary judge's decision was well-reasoned and supported by the evidence presented in the case. The court found no grounds to overturn the decision of the lower court.
As a result of the court's decision, special leave to appeal was refused. The court also directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application with costs. This decision serves as a reminder of the importance of demonstrating a realistic prospect of success when seeking special leave to appeal in the High Court of Australia. The case highlights the rigorous standards that the court applies when considering applications for special leave to appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.