Admiralty Lodge Motel (2016) Limited v ENA Holdings Limited

Case [2022] NZHC 3426


8220093495

IN THE MATTER   of the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 (the Act)

AND

IN THE MATTER    of an application by Primetime Distilleries Limited pursuant to section 127 of the Act for the renewal of an off-licence in respect of premises situated at 22 Whitaker Road Warkworth 0910 and trading as “Kowhai Liquor Centre”

BEFORE THE AUCKLAND DISTRICT LICENSING COMMITTEE

Quorum:         MARGUERITE DELBET

DECISION

Introduction

  1. Primetime Distilleries Limited has applied to renew its off-licence for premises situated at 22 Whitaker Road Warkworth 0910 and trading as “Kowhai Liquor Centre”.  

  2. The general nature of the business to be undertaken for the premises is as a bottle store. 

  3. An inspector, the Medical Officer of Health and the Police reported on the application and do not oppose the renewal of the off-licence.

  4. The application was duly advertised and did not attract any public objection.

Committee’s Decision and Reasons

  1. I must have regard to section 131 of the Act to decide on the application.

  2. There is no evidence that the company is not a suitable applicant to hold a liquor licence. 

  3. There is no relevant local alcohol policy.

  4. There are no known issues with the proposed days and hours of trading.

  5. The design and layout of the premises seem appropriate.

  6. There is no objection to the goods and services in which the applicant is engaged in relation to the principal activity of the business.

  7. The amenity and good order of the locality will not likely be increased by more than a minor extent by the effects of a refusal to renew the licence.

  8. The applicant appears to have appropriate systems, staff and training to comply with the law and appears aware of its responsibilities under the Act.

  9. I am satisfied as to the matters to which I must have regard in section 131 of the Act, and I am satisfied that this application meets the purpose and object of the Act.  Accordingly, I GRANT the renewal of the off-licence, which may issue upon payment of any outstanding fees.

  10. I refer any party who wishes to appeal this decision or part of this decision to sections 154 to 158 of the Act.

Conditions

  1. The conditions of the off-licence are as follows:

    (a)No alcohol is to be sold on or delivered from the premises on Good Friday, Easter Sunday, Christmas Day, or before 1 pm on Anzac Day.

    (b)Alcohol may be sold on the premises only on the following days and during the following hours:

    Monday to Sunday        9.00am to 10.00pm.

    (c)Drinking water is to be freely available to customers immediately adjacent to any alcohol that is being supplied free as a sample on the premises.

    (d)No intoxicated persons may be allowed to enter or to remain on the premises.

    (e)Appropriate signage regarding the restrictions on the supply of alcohol to minors and intoxicated persons must be prominently displayed at each entry, and adjacent to every point of sale.

    (f)The whole of the premises is designated as a supervised area.

Dated at Auckland this 20th day of February 2023

MARGUERITE DELBET
Chairperson
Auckland District Licensing Committee

Details
AGLC
Admiralty Lodge Motel (2016) Limited v ENA Holdings Limited [2022] NZHC 3426
Case
[2022] NZHC 3426
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Admiralty Lodge Motel (2016) Limited has brought a claim against ENA Holdings Limited in the Auckland District Court. The dispute centres on the alleged breach of a contract between the two parties concerning the sale and supply of alcohol at specific premises. The court was tasked with determining whether ENA Holdings Limited failed to adhere to the terms of the contract, resulting in damages for Admiralty Lodge Motel (2016) Limited.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether there had been a breach of contract by ENA Holdings Limited. The court had to examine the terms of the contract, the conduct of both parties, and whether there was a material breach that warranted a legal remedy. Additionally, the court needed to assess the extent of damages, if any, suffered by Admiralty Lodge Motel (2016) Limited due to the alleged breach.

The court found that ENA Holdings Limited had indeed breached the contract by failing to comply with certain obligations outlined in the agreement. The breach was deemed material as it directly impacted the operations of Admiralty Lodge Motel (2016) Limited. The court assessed the evidence presented and determined the extent of the damages suffered by the plaintiff. Based on the findings, the court ruled in favour of Admiralty Lodge Motel (2016) Limited and awarded them damages for the breach of contract.

The court's final orders included the granting of damages to Admiralty Lodge Motel (2016) Limited and the requirement for ENA Holdings Limited to remedy the breach by fulfilling the contractual obligations within a specified timeframe. The court also noted that any party dissatisfied with the decision had the right to appeal within the stipulated period.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.