IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND
CA266/2008
[2009] NZCA 391BETWEENANZA DISTRIBUTING NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
Appellant
ANDUSG INTERIORS PACIFIC LIMITED
Respondent
Court:Glazebrook, Robertson and Ellen France JJ
Counsel:E Orlov and N Adjei for Appellant
M R Crotty and G A Lawery for RespondentJudgment:4 September 2009 at 10.00 am
(On the Papers)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The application to bring an appeal out of time is dismissed.
____________________________________________________________________
REASONS OF THE COURT
(Given by Glazebrook J)
[1] We refer to the Court’s minute of 26 August 2009. In that minute we referred to Mr and Mrs Misbin’s application (purportedly on behalf of ANZA) to bring an appeal out of time against Associate Judge Robinson’s decision of 12 March 2008.
[2] We also referred to counsel’s letter of 19 June 2009 and accompanying memorandum which acknowledged that their clients (Mr and Mrs Misbin) do not have the authority to bring proceedings in the name of ANZA and asking for an adjournment until High Court applications to bring proceedings in the name of ANZA were decided.
[3] We expressed the view that, given our decision in H A Misbin and J H Misbin v USG Interiors Pacific Ltd [2009] NZCA 379 declining an extension of time to appeal against Cooper J’s decision of 3 November 2008, the application with regard to Associate Judge Robinson’s judgment must also be declined.
[4] We gave counsel the opportunity to file a memorandum setting out any reasons why the application should not be dismissed.
[5] Counsel were told that, if no memorandum was received from Mr and Mrs Misbin by 5.00 pm on Tuesday 1 September 2009, the application would be dismissed. No memorandum has been received and the application is dismissed accordingly.
Solicitors:
Botany Law, Auckland for Appellants
Russell McVeagh, Auckland for Respondent
- AGLC
- ANZA Distributing New Zealand Limited v USG Interiors Pacific Limited [2009] NZCA 391
- Case
- [2009] NZCA 391
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Court were whether the Misbins had the authority to bring the appeal on behalf of ANZA and if there were any grounds to grant an extension of time to appeal. The Court had to determine whether the application by the Misbins should be dismissed, considering the lack of authority to represent ANZA and the previous decision declining an extension of time for another appeal in the same matter.
The Court, in its reasons for judgment, explained that it had previously decided to decline an extension of time for an appeal in the same matter. The Court noted that the Misbins did not have the authority to bring the appeal on behalf of ANZA and that they had not provided any reasons why the application should not be dismissed. The Court dismissed the application to bring the appeal out of time, as no memorandum was received from the Misbins by the specified deadline.
No further orders were made by the Court. The appeal by ANZA Distributing New Zealand Limited against the decision of USG Interiors Pacific Limited was dismissed, and the Court upheld the decision of Associate Judge Robinson made on 12 March 2008.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.