Daniels v Daniels

Case [2018] NZHC 1578


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE

CIV-2018-409-000394

[2018] NZHC 1578

UNDER the Trustee Act 1956

IN THE MATTER

of an Application for Vesting Order

BETWEEN

ALMA LINDSAY DANIELS

Applicant

AND

WILLIAM HENRY DANIELS

Respondent

Hearing: 28 June 2018 (Determined on the papers)

Appearances:

P C Maciaszek for the Applicant

Judgment:

28 June 2018


JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE MATTHEWS


[1]    The plaintiff, Mrs A L Daniels, is a trustee of the Daniels Family Trust which owns a property in Christchurch. The defendant, Mr W H Daniels, is Mrs Daniels’ husband. They were the original settlors of the Trust and until May 2018, were the trustees.

[2]    Unhappily, Mr Daniels has developed a serious debilitating illness. Medical evidence produced to the Court shows that he is unable to carry out his duties as a trustee of the Trust. In May 2018, Mrs Daniels appointed her daughter, Mrs Dowie, as a second trustee, and removed Mr Daniels as a trustee, pursuant to a power in the Trust deed. She now seeks a vesting order in relation to the property owned by the Trust, into the joint names of herself and Mrs Jillian Dowie.

DANIELS v DANIELS [2018] NZHC 1578 [28 June 2018]

[3]    Accompanying the substantive proceeding as an interlocutory application without notice for directions as to service and representation, Mrs Dowie is the only child of Mr and Mrs Daniels and she and her two children are the sole discretionary beneficiaries in the Trust. All have been served with the proceeding and all consent to the Court making the orders sought in the substantive proceeding. I am satisfied that no order is required for further service in the circumstances of this case.

[4]    I am further satisfied that it is appropriate for the substantive orders sought by Mrs Daniels to be made.   The evidence satisfies the Court that the condition of     Mr Daniels, now, is such that not only is he unable to look after his own affairs and those of the Trust, but also, he will not recover to a point where he might so do. The step of removing him as a trustee was an appropriate one to be made and a vesting order consequent on that step is entirely appropriate. I note a pressing need for this to be attended to as Mrs Daniels has moved from the Trust’s property into a retirement apartment and the trustees must now take immediate steps to sell the Trust property and take title to the new property accordingly.

[5]As a result, therefore:

(a)I direct that no further service of this application is required;

(b)I make a vesting order under s 52 of the Trustee Act 1956 vesting the property at 34B Northfield Road, Casebrook, Christchurch, Identifier 523361 (Canterbury Land Registration District) in the names of  Alma Lindsay Daniels and Jillian Dowie, the current trustees of the Daniels Family Trust.

[6]No issue arises in relation to costs.


J G Matthews Associate Judge

Solicitors:

Maciaszek Brown Law, Christchurch

Details
AGLC
Daniels v Daniels [2018] NZHC 1578
Case
[2018] NZHC 1578
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the High Court of New Zealand, Christchurch Registry, Alma Lindsay Daniels, as trustee of the Daniels Family Trust, filed an application for a vesting order against her husband, William Henry Daniels. The trust owns a property in Christchurch, which was originally established by the couple. The applicant sought to vest the property in the joint names of herself and her daughter, Jillian Dowie, as a result of the respondent's deteriorating health rendering him incapable of fulfilling his duties as trustee.

The legal issue before the court was whether the removal of the respondent as a trustee and the subsequent vesting of the property in the joint names of the applicant and her daughter was appropriate. The applicant argued that the respondent's health condition made him unable to manage his affairs and those of the trust, and that it was necessary to remove him as a trustee and vest the property in the names of the current trustees.

The court found that the evidence presented satisfied it that the respondent was indeed unable to look after his own affairs and those of the trust, and that he would not recover to a point where he might so do. The court also noted the pressing need for the vesting order to be made, as the applicant had already moved from the trust's property into a retirement apartment and the trustees must now take immediate steps to sell the trust property and take title to the new property accordingly.

The court granted the application for a vesting order and directed that no further service of the application was required. The property at 34B Northfield Road, Casebrook, Christchurch, was vested in the names of Alma Lindsay Daniels and Jillian Dowie, the current trustees of the Daniels Family Trust. The court also noted that no issue arose in relation to costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.