Michelson

Case [2019] NZHC 2446


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE

CIV-2019-485-604868

[2019] NZHC 2446

UNDER the Administration Act 1969

IN THE MATTER

of the Estate of Samuel George Collins also known as George Samuel Collins

BETWEEN

KERRYN JOY MICHELSON

Applicant

Hearing: On the Papers

Counsel:

R D Clark

Judgment:

26 September 2019


JUDGMENT OF CLARK J


[1]    This is an application for costs by the executor of the estate of Mr Samuel George Collins, who died in March 2019.

[2]    Mr Collins left a will dated 22 February 2017. An application for probate was filed on 1 April 2019. On 9 April 2019, a caveat against the grant of administration was lodged on behalf of Ms Margaret Rippey and Ms Susan Guest, (the caveators). On 17 May 2019, the executor filed a without notice application for an order nisi for the grant of administration. The order nisi was sealed on 20 May 2019 and the matter schedule for hearing on 19 June 2019 for the caveators to show cause why the order nisi should not be made absolute. The caveat was withdrawn on 18 June 2019, the day before the fixture. On 19 June 2019, Toogood J granted an “order absolute as moved” and reserved costs for exchange of memoranda.

MICHELSON [2019] NZHC 2446 [26 September 2019]

[3]    The executor’s solicitors attempted to resolve costs with the caveators by email to their solicitors dated 8 July 2019. They received no response. The executor now seeks costs of $6,690 on a 2B basis and disbursements of $84.85. Mr Clark, for the executor, submits the caveat proceeding caused unnecessary delay, family upset and cost, and a cost order against the caveators is appropriate. The executor’s submissions on costs were filed and served on 23 July 2019. No memorandum has been filed on behalf of the  caveators.  Registry  followed  up  with  the  caveators’ solicitors  on 18 September 2019. Again, no response was received.

[4]    Costs are at the Court’s discretion but generally follow the event.1 Where a will is contested, it will sometimes be appropriate to award costs from the estate rather than against any party to the proceeding. In Re Paterson (Deceased), Stringer J identified two circumstances in which that course of action would be appropriate: where the litigation originates in the fault of the testator; or where there are reasonable grounds to suspect the testator lacked testamentary capacity or was induced to sign the will by undue influence or fraud.2 In all other cases, there is no reason to depart from the ordinary rule that costs follow the event. This approach has recently been upheld by the Court of Appeal in Crawford v Phillips and Loosley v Powell.3

[5]    I am satisfied that costs should follow the event. And, I am further satisfied that the costs occasioned by the unexplained steps taken by the caveators should not be borne by the estate. By withdrawing the caveat the day before the hearing, without explanation, the reasonable assumption is that there were no grounds to sustain it. I see the caveators as being in much the same position as a party who discontinues proceedings. The presumption in such cases is that the discontinuing party must pay costs as if he or she were the losing party.4

[6]    The caveators must pay to the executor costs in the sum of $4,440.85 and disbursements of $84.85. The executor is also entitled to the costs of this application, which I set at $296. The sum which I have awarded is based on my assessment of the


1      High Court Rules 2016,  rr  14.1  and 14.2(1)(a); and  Shirley v Wairarapa District Health Board

[2006] NZSC 63, [2006] 3 NZLR 523 at [19].

2      Re Paterson (Deceased) [1924] NZLR 441.

3      Crawford v Phillips [2018] NZCA 351; and Loosley v Powell [2018] NZCA 73.

4      High Court Rules 2016, r 15.23.

proceedings as “straightforward” requiring a “normal” amount of time for each step. Accordingly, counsel’s calculation of costs on a 2B basis, has been reduced to category 1B costs.

Result

[7]    The applicant executor is awarded costs in the sum of $4820.85, to be paid by the caveators.


Karen Clark J

Solicitors:
Lewis, Cambridge for Applicant

Details
AGLC
Michelson [2019] NZHC 2446
Case
[2019] NZHC 2446
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The High Court of New Zealand, Wellington Registry, heard a case concerning an application for costs made by the executor of the estate of Mr Samuel George Collins. The application was brought by Kerryn Joy Michelson, the executor of Mr Collins' estate, against Ms Margaret Rippey and Ms Susan Guest, who had lodged a caveat against the grant of administration of the estate. The case centred around the costs incurred due to the unexplained withdrawal of the caveat by the caveators just before the scheduled hearing.

The primary legal issue the court had to decide was whether the costs incurred by the executor due to the actions of the caveators should be borne by the estate or should be awarded against the caveators. The court considered whether the circumstances warranted an exception to the general rule that costs follow the event, which would apply if there were grounds to suspect the testator lacked testamentary capacity or was influenced by undue pressure. The court concluded that there were no such grounds in this case and therefore, the costs should be awarded against the caveators.

Clark J held that the caveators' actions caused unnecessary delay and upset, and their failure to provide any explanation for the withdrawal of the caveat indicated that there were no valid grounds to sustain it. The court reasoned that the caveators should be treated similarly to a party who discontinues proceedings, which under the High Court Rules means that the discontinuing party must pay costs as if they were the losing party. The judge awarded costs to the executor in the amount of $4,440.85, plus disbursements of $84.85, and an additional $296 for the costs of this application.

In summary, the court determined that the costs incurred by the executor due to the caveators' actions should not be borne by the estate and ordered the caveators to pay the executor $4,820.85 in costs. This decision was based on the principle that costs generally follow the event, and the absence of any grounds to suspect undue influence or lack of testamentary capacity.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.