IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
CIV-2015-485-771 [2017] NZHC 1320
UNDER the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 IN THE MATTER
of a claim for damages
BETWEEN
KERRYN MITCHELL Plaintiff
AND
ATTORNEY-GENERAL Defendant
On the papers Counsel:
K Mitchell in Person
D Harris for DefendantJudgment:
15 June 2017
JUDGMENT OF THOMAS J
[1] By her amended statement of claim dated 16 August 2016, the plaintiff, Kerryn Mitchell, brings claims against the defendant under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.
[2] The claims concern the actions of the Prison Manager at Arohata Prison who withheld correspondence written by Ms Mitchell, when she was remanded in custody at the Prison. The correspondence was addressed to Arthur Taylor, a prisoner at Auckland Prison. Ms Mitchell seeks relief in the form of a declaration, compensatory and exemplary damages, and any other relief the Court may consider just. Ms Mitchell is self-represented.
[3] The defendant accepts that in this case letters written by Ms Mitchell, dated
28 March and 22 April 2013 respectively, were withheld unreasonably in breach of s 14 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, which provides:
MITCHELL v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2017] NZHC 1320 [15 June 2017]
14 Freedom of expression
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression, including the freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and opinions of any kind in any form.
[4] The defendant is agreeable to the making of a declaration to that effect.
[5] The defendant has also agreed to pay public law compensation in respect of the breach of s 14. This amount will be subject to the provisions of the Prisoners and Victims Claims Act 2005.
Orders
[6] By consent, judgment is given for the plaintiff on the following terms:
[7] A declaration that Ms Mitchell’s letters dated 28 March and 22 April
2013 respectively were withheld unreasonably in breach of s 14 of the
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.
[8] An order that the defendant is to pay public law compensation of
$1500 in respect of the breach, the amount being payable to the Secretary for Justice to be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of s 17(1) of the Prisoners and Victims Claims Act 2005.
[9] No order as to costs is sought.
[10] The proceeding in respect of the balance of the claim is to be treated as discontinued forthwith.
Thomas J
Solicitors:
Crown Law, Wellington
- AGLC
- Mitchell v Attorney-General [2017] NZHC 1320
- Case
- [2017] NZHC 1320
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved whether the actions of the Prison Manager in withholding Mitchell's letters constituted an unreasonable breach of her right to freedom of expression under section 14 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Section 14 guarantees the right to freedom of expression, including the freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and opinions. The court also needed to determine the appropriate form of compensation for the breach.
The court found that the defendant accepted the breach of Mitchell's right to freedom of expression and agreed to the making of a declaration to that effect. The defendant also agreed to pay public law compensation, the amount of which would be determined under the provisions of the Prisoners and Victims Claims Act 2005. By consent, the court issued a declaration that the letters were withheld unreasonably and ordered the defendant to pay public law compensation of $1500. The balance of the claim was discontinued.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.