IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE
CIV-2025-409-368
[2025] NZHC 2572
IN THE MATTER of the Insolvency Act 2006 AND
IN THE MATTER
of an application to discharge the bankruptcy of Jayne Marie Mortimer
BETWEEN
JAYNE MARIE MORTIMER
Judgment Debtor/Applicant
AND
AND
THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
First Respondent
THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE
Second Respondent
Hearing: 4 September 2025 Appearances:
C Mo for Judgment Debtor/Applicant D Lotz for First Respondent
No appearance for Second Respondent
Judgment:
5 September 2025
JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE LESTER
J MORTIMER v THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE [2025] NZHC 2572 [5 September 2025]
[1]Mrs Mortimer applies to have her bankruptcy discharged.
[2] Mrs Mortimer was adjudicated bankrupt on 4 May 2017 by the Commissioner of Inland Revenue (the Commissioner).
[3] Mrs Mortimer deposes that he had assumed her time in bankruptcy would start to run automatically from 4 May 2017. Mrs Mortimer did not complete her Statement of Affairs meaning that pursuant to s 290(1) of the Insolvency Act 2006 (the Act), Mrs Mortimer remains in bankruptcy as the three year period of bankruptcy runs from the filing of a bankrupt’s Statement of Affairs.
[4] Mrs Mortimer lodged a Statement of Affairs on 18 March 2025, meaning she will only become eligible for automatic discharge on 18 March 2028, hence she seeks to be discharged from bankruptcy under s 294(1) of the Act.
[5] The Official Assignee has filed a report in respect of Mrs Mortimer, recording his creditors were relatively modest and save in respect of Mrs Mortimer’s failure to file a Statement of Affairs, despite being chased up by the Official Assignee, the Official Assignee concludes there is nothing untoward to report in relation to the conduct of Mrs Mortimer.
[6]The Official Assignee has no objection to the discharge.
[7] The application has been advertised albeit just short of 20 working days prior to the call of the application on 4 September 2025, required by r 24.37 of the High Court Rules 2016. I abridge time in respect of that 20-working day period.
[8] There is no point leaving Mrs Mortimer in bankruptcy. She has already been bankrupt for over eight years. It is appropriate that the state of affairs be brought to an end particularly when the Official Assignee sees no point it continuing.
[9] Accordingly, in respect of Mrs Mortimer, I make an order in terms of paragraph 1.1 of each of her application.
Associate Judge Lester
Solicitors:
Saunders & Co, Christchurch
Inland Revenue Department, Christchurch Official Assignee, Christchurch
- AGLC
- Mortimer v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2025] NZHC 2572
- Case
- [2025] NZHC 2572
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Associate Judge Lester considered the arguments and the relevant provisions of the Insolvency Act. The court noted that Mrs. Mortimer did not file her Statement of Affairs until 18 March 2025, which extended her period of bankruptcy. However, the court also noted that the delay was not due to any misconduct on Mrs. Mortimer's part, and the Official Assignee reported no other issues. The court further acknowledged that the application was advertised just short of the required 20 working days, but decided to abridge time in this regard. Given that Mrs. Mortimer has already been in bankruptcy for over eight years and the Official Assignee saw no reason to continue the state of affairs, the court concluded that it was appropriate to discharge Mrs. Mortimer from bankruptcy.
The final orders made by the court are as follows: Mrs. Mortimer's bankruptcy is to be discharged in terms of paragraph 1.1 of her application. This decision brings to an end her prolonged period of bankruptcy and allows her to move forward without the burden of her financial past.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.