IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE
CIV-2023-409-647
[2023] NZHC 3763
IN THE MATTER of the Insolvency Act 2006 AND
IN THE MATTER
of the bankruptcy of Michael Denis Corcoran
BETWEEN
NUTTALL PROPERTIES LIMITED
Judgment Creditor
AND
MICHAEL DENIS CORCORAN
Judgment Debtor
Hearing: (On the papers) Counsel:
C M Hanafin for Judgment Creditor
Judgment:
18 December 2023
JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE LESTER
(substituted service)
NUTTALL PROPERTIES LIMITED v CORCORAN [2023] NZHC 3763 [18 December 2023]
[1] The judgment creditor seeks an order for substituted service against the judgment debtor in respect of a bankruptcy notice.
[2] The methods of proposed substituted service are conventional enough, that is, an order dispensing with personal service is sought on the basis service is deemed to have been effected by serving the bankruptcy notice via the judgment debtor’s email address and on his son who is in contact with the judgment debtor.
[3] So much is not controversial save that the material filed in support of the substituted service application suggests, and I put it no higher than that, that the judgment debtor is in Australia.
[4] If the judgment debtor resides in Australia then the judgment creditor requires leave under s 17(3) of the Insolvency Act 2006 to serve the judgment debtor outside of New Zealand.
[5] Associate Judge Bell in Westpac New Zealand Limited v Boulton, set out his approach to considering an application for leave to serve a bankruptcy notice outside of New Zealand.1 While an application for leave has not been made, I take such an application to be implicit in what the judgment creditor seeks to achieve.
[6] The circumstances giving rise to the judgment debt are squarely connected to events in New Zealand. Accordingly, and albeit perhaps out of an abundance of caution, there is an order that the bankruptcy notice in this proceeding may be served out of New Zealand (if such leave turns out to have been required).
[7] Further, I am satisfied that having regard to the reports of process servers involved, that reasonable efforts have been made to serve the bankruptcy notice on the judgment debtor and that it cannot be served properly.
1 Westpac New Zealand Ltd v Boulton [2014] NZHC 693; (2014) 22 PRNZ 183.
[8] I am further satisfied that the following directions which I make represent the method of service likely to bring the bankruptcy notice to the attention of the judgment debtor.
Orders
[9] I direct personal service of the judgment debtor with the bankruptcy notice is dispensed with.
[10] Service of the judgment debtor will be deemed to be effected upon the completion of the following two steps:
(i)emailing the bankruptcy notice and a copy of this judgment to the email address given at paragraph 1.1(a) of the application for substituted service dated 14 December 2023; and
(ii)personally serving the bankruptcy notice and copy of this judgment on the judgment debtor’s son named in paragraph 1.1(b) of the application for substituted service dated 14 December 2023.
[11] The documents will be treated as served, three working days after the completion of both steps set out in [10] above.
[12] The application for substituted service is adjourned with leave to the judgment creditor to request by memorandum a further order as to substituted service in the event any adjudication application cannot be promptly served (in which event the memorandum should contain counsel’s confirmation that the judgment debtor can still not be located or attaching evidence as to subsequent difficulties of service).
Costs
[13] The costs of the application are fixed on a 2B basis and are, with disbursements, to be costs in the cause.
[14] The orders for substituted service can be sealed upon counsel for the judgment creditor by way of memorandum providing the certificate that is required in relation to a without notice application, such having been omitted from the application dated 14 December 2023. That certificate can be found at paragraph 5 of Form G32, part of Schedule 1 to the High Court Rules 2016.
Associate Judge Lester
Solicitors:
MDS Law, Christchurch (for Judgment Creditor)
Copy to counsel:
J Moss and C M Hanafin, Barristers, Christchurch (for Judgment Creditor)
Copy to:
The Judgment Debtor
- AGLC
- Nuttall Properties Limited v Corcoran [2023] NZHC 3763
- Case
- [2023] NZHC 3763
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the judgment creditor needed to seek leave under section 17(3) of the Insolvency Act to serve the bankruptcy notice outside New Zealand. Additionally, the court had to assess whether the proposed methods of substituted service were reasonable and likely to bring the notice to the debtor's attention. The connection between the judgment debt and events in New Zealand played a crucial role in the court's decision.
Associate Judge Lester concluded that the circumstances necessitating the judgment debt were indeed linked to New Zealand. While the creditor had not formally applied for leave to serve the notice outside New Zealand, the court treated such an application as implicit in the creditor's request. The court granted the leave implicitly, considering the debtor's residence in Australia, and determined that reasonable efforts had been made to serve the notice personally. The court then directed that service of the bankruptcy notice would be deemed complete via email to the debtor and personal service on the debtor's son, followed by a waiting period of three working days. The application for substituted service was adjourned, allowing the creditor to request further orders if the adjudication application could not be promptly served.
The court also addressed the costs, fixing them on a 2B basis, with disbursements to be costs in the cause. The creditor could seal the orders for substituted service by providing the necessary certificate for a without notice application, which was omitted from the initial application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.