IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND
CA113/06
[2007] NZCA 338
BETWEEN RON WEST MOTORS (OTAHUHU)
LIMITED Appellant
AND THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND
REVENUE Respondent
Court: William Young P, Robertson and Wilson JJ
Counsel: S R G Judd for Appellant
C K Wood for Respondent
Judgment (on the papers) 8 August 2007 at 11 am
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The appellant is ordered to pay to the respondent costs of $1,500 and usual disbursements.
REASONS OF THE COURT
(Given by Wilson J)
The appellant sought to appeal against a decision of an Associate Judge in Chambers.
The proper way to challenge that decision would have been to apply to the High Court for a review of the decision by a Judge.
RON WEST MOTORS (OTAHUHU) LIMITED V THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE CA CA113/06 [8 August 2007]
[3] The respondent attempted to persuade the appellant to follow that procedure. He was unsuccessful, and therefore filed in this Court a Memorandum raising the question of jurisdiction.
[4] Following a telephone conference, the appellant accepted that this Court had no jurisdiction and abandoned the appeal.
[5] The respondent now seeks an order that the sum of $4,300 fixed and paid as security for costs be paid to him in full.
[6] The appellant opposes that application and submits that there should be no costs awarded because there was no necessity for the respondent to have incurred any costs.
[7] The respondent is in our view entitled to a reasonable contribution towards his costs. The appeal should not have been filed when this Court had no jurisdiction to consider it, and the respondent was therefore justified in raising the question of jurisdiction as a preliminary issue.
[8] We think that the appropriate quantum of costs is $1,500 and usual disbursements.
We make an order accordingly.
Solicitors:
Quay Law (Auckland) for Appellant
Crown Solicitor (Auckland) for Respondent
- AGLC
- Ron West Motors (Otahuhu) Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2007] NZCA 338
- Case
- [2007] NZCA 338
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court of Appeal found that the Commissioner was entitled to a reasonable contribution towards his costs, given that the appeal should not have been filed when the Court had no jurisdiction. The Court considered it appropriate for the Commissioner to raise the issue of jurisdiction as a preliminary matter. The Court awarded the Commissioner $1,500 and usual disbursements as a contribution towards his costs. The Court made an order that the sum of $1,500 and usual disbursements be paid by the appellant to the Commissioner.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.