Tapsell v The the Queen

Case [2022] NZHC 398


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND DUNEDIN REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA ŌTEPOTI ROHE

CRI-2021-412-51

[2022] NZHC 398

UNDER the Criminal Procedure Act 2011

IN THE MATTER

of an appeal against sentence

BETWEEN

RYAN KARL TAPSELL

Appellant

AND

THE QUEEN

Respondent

Hearing: 28 February 2022

Counsel:

D Henderson for Appellant R P Bates for Respondent

Judgment:

28 February 2022


JUDGMENT OF OSBORNE J

(result)


This judgment was delivered by me on 9 March 2022 at 9.30 am

Registrar/Deputy Registrar Date:

TAPSELL v R [2022] NZHC 398 [28 February 2022]

[1]                 Ryan Tapsell was sentenced in the District Court on a charge of assault,1 one charge of assault on a person in a family relationship,2 and a representative charge of contravening a protection order.3 He pleaded guilty to those charges, while the Police withdrew a number of other charges.

[2]  On 7 December 2021 Judge M B T Turner sentenced Mr Tapsell to two years four months’ imprisonment on the charge of contravening a protection order, with concurrent sentences of seven months’ imprisonment for assault in a family relationship and three months’ imprisonment for assault (the sentencing).4 A protection order was also made against Mr Tapsell.5

[3]                 Mr Tapsell appeals the sentence on the basis the Judge erred by giving insignificant discounts for mitigating factors, resulting in a manifestly excessive sentence. He also appealed the imposition of the protection order.

Outcome

[4]Having heard submissions, I dismiss the appeal. My reasons will follow.

Osborne J

Solicitors:

Crown Solicitor, Dunedin

Copy to: D Henderson, Barrister, Dunedin


1      Crimes Act 1961, s 196: maximum penalty one years’ imprisonment.

2      Section 194A: maximum penalty two years’ imprisonment.

3      Family Violence Act 2018, ss 90(a), 9 and 112(1)(a): maximum penalty of three years’ imprisonment.

4      R v Tapsell [2021] NZDC 24189.

5      Under Sentencing Act 2002, s 123B.

Details
AGLC
Tapsell v The the Queen [2022] NZHC 398
Case
[2022] NZHC 398
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Ryan Karl Tapsell was convicted of assault, assault on a person in a family relationship, and contravening a protection order. He appealed his sentence of two years and four months imprisonment for the protection order violation, and concurrent sentences for the other charges. The appeal was against the sentence length and the imposition of a protection order. The sentencing judge had given a seven-month sentence for assault in a family relationship and a three-month sentence for assault. The judge also made a protection order against Tapsell.

The legal issues were whether the sentencing judge erred in giving insignificant discounts for mitigating factors and whether the sentence was manifestly excessive. The appeal also questioned the imposition of the protection order. The judge considered submissions from both parties and found that the sentence was not manifestly excessive and that the protection order was appropriate.

In dismissing the appeal, the judge found that the sentence was not manifestly excessive and that the protection order was appropriate. The mitigating factors were considered but did not warrant a significantly lower sentence. The appeal was dismissed, and the original sentence and protection order stood.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.